Horrible company - Project Manager System Pavers Employee Review

1.0
17 Sept 2021
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Set your own schedule as a PM

Cons

Poor management: The poor managements way of “fixing” things is to cause high turnover at the lowest level jobs. Nothing is ever addressed appropriately. The higher levels of management are rewarded on jobs sold and not on the success of the company. So they care little about the quality of projects making their way into PMs hands. Good talent is usually disregarded or let go if not willing to play by the crooked rules of SP while inadequate employees willing to lie, cheat, and steal from clients are rewarded with promotions.

avatar
System Pavers Response
4y
Thank you for taking the time to write System Pavers a review on Glassdoor. It is important for us to hear what we are doing well and what we need to improve upon. We are surprised at the one-star review and are not happy that your experience working here has been unsatisfactory which means that in your case, we have failed somewhere along the line. Since you are a current employee at System Pavers, I hope you are attending our monthly Town Hall meetings. If you are attending, you have been hearing all the great work our company is doing in ensuring System Pavers continues to be a great company to work for. The last meeting focused on our Project Managers and the improvements being made to make the Project Manager position easier which you state is your position. You say you are working in our Union City office. System Pavers has an Open-Door policy, and we encourage everyone to voice their concerns. We take all feedback seriously in our quest to improve things. After showing this review, the Regional Operations Manager is urging you to speak with him and share your insight and concerns. We are here to make this a great place to work. Again, thank you for the feedback.

Explore other reviews about System Pavers

5.0
8 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing Work/life balance Great money

Cons

Fully commission Slow during the cold months

1.0
17 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not many pros, it's a CA company run by PI firm which is a negative in itself.

Cons

Operating, or disquised, as a "Design Consultant" at System Pavers (SP) reveals a glaring disconnect between corporate promises and field reality. The training program (SPU) is fundamentally deficient, failing to provide adequate technical design, diagramming, or specialized virtualization tool training required to actually perform the job successfully. No promised review or feedback of your diagrams you were required to produced. Instead, the entire onboarding infrastructure is built to enforce a rigid, high-pressure sales loop, ie. "PROCESS", under heavy private equity oversight. Perhaps that is why they changed the role from "Design Consultant" to "Outside Sales". Management mandates an incredibly misleading "90-minute appointment" narrative to homeowners, which in reality is a high-pressure, 3-to-4-hour grueling ordeal designed solely to force a "First Time Close" (FTC). This hard-sell tactic is alienating; pushing a "buy now" ultimatum actively offends qualified prospects who would otherwise buy based on product merit. Because the timeline is so unrealistic, a massive percentage of appointments collapse into unworkable follow-ups. Financially, the role is highly exploitative of your personal resources and hard work: Zero Mileage Reimbursement: Despite requiring extensive road travel to homeowner locations, there is absolutely no compensation for vehicle wear-and-tear or fuel. You absorb 100% of the operational risk of driving for the company. Commission Cannibalization: Management routinely slashes or completely burns your hard-earned commission under the guise of "making the deal work." They expect you to absorb the financial hit for the sake of the sale, meaning you do all the legwork only for leadership to erase your payout at the closing table. 401K Match: A maximum of $300 match, annually. Wow! It would have been better to just say no match than to trick someone into thinking they could benefit from their match.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All