High stress and long hours overshadow resume boost - Senior Supplier Quality Engineer Tesla Employee Review

1.0
26 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working at Tesla proves you are highly resilient and able to handle long working hours. The company has extremely strict recruitment criteria, so many candidates fail to get hired after interviews. A work experience at Tesla is a real highlight on your resume. What’s more, the new energy industry enjoys promising prospects.

Cons

Tesla Gigafactory Shanghai enjoys a positive public image and marketing reputation, yet its internal management is far from satisfactory. Excessively long and frequent meetings Meetings take up a great deal of working time. Weekly team meetings on Mondays last for around three hours, while product and project progress meetings are held on Tuesday and Wednesday respectively. Many attendees deliver lengthy reports of 30 minutes or more. These meetings often run through lunch breaks, and afternoon progress sessions usually drag on for at least two and a half hours, forcing employees to work overtime regularly. Extreme working hours and frequent business trips Staff in Supply Chain, R&D and Procurement are required to travel constantly. Many have to leave for airports or railway stations as early as 6 a.m. Even for trips to nearby cities like Suzhou and Changshu, most make round trips on the same day, often getting home as late as 8 p.m. The workplace is highly stressful. Managers focus solely on supervision instead of helping engineers solve practical problems. The top-down management style creates a lack of trust between leaders and team members. Most employees are out on business trips four days a week, leaving little time for family life. Repetitive reporting and heavy documentation workload The same issues need to be reported repeatedly to quality teams, production departments and different supervisors on various occasions. Each department has its own standards for reports, requiring constant revisions and updates. Employees spend days travelling, then attend meetings and submit reports after work. Mandatory evening training sessions also take up personal time, making overtime for paperwork a daily routine. Limited benefits and no year-end bonuses for all staff The compensation package only includes 12-month base salary and stock options, with no additional perks or holiday gifts. No employees in the company receive year-end bonuses, and the management has never provided any explanation for this. Work culture values compliance over independent thinking Currying favor with supervisors matters more than actual job performance. Leaders prefer employees who report frequently and follow orders unconditionally, rather than those who are innovative and think independently. Employees are expected only to execute tasks instead of offering ideas. High turnover and strict speech control The company has a high employee turnover rate. Strict rules are imposed on external remarks: only two designated staff members are allowed to speak to the media. All other employees may only share official content, and any personal opinions are prohibited, with potential legal consequences for violations. Undisclosed non-compete agreements and bureaucratic management New hires are required to sign the non-compete agreement together with the employment contract upon onboarding, and this requirement is never disclosed during recruitment. The company enforces the non-compete restrictions on many regular engineers after they resign, which prevents them from taking up new job offers. Job seekers should stay alert. The advertised flat management structure does not exist. The workplace is highly bureaucratic with rigid hierarchies. Employees are forbidden to report problems to senior leaders across levels, and some have spoken out online about unfair treatment at work. 24/7 on-call requirement Messages about work progress are sent around the clock via Teams and WeChat. Employees are expected to reply instantly. Failure to respond during off-hours or on weekends will be regarded as insubordination, leading to unfair treatment or retaliation. All the above are true experiences. I choose to remain anonymous to avoid repercussions.

Explore other reviews about Tesla

5.0
4 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

good products, team, and hours

Cons

high demand of work on all levels

3.0
27 Apr 2017
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Completely casual dress code Flexibility to work from home when needed Always interesting to work at the factory If you look at the SEC filings, you can see that the top people are basically compensated the same as the other employees, which is a pleasant surprise. Many “beautiful people” here (male and female). Lots of eye candy. A lot of people complain about the pay, but they paid me more than my last company, where I had the same title LGBT friendly The product is cool, and really fun to drive If you’re in the right department, you might be able to drive a Tesla somewhat regularly. If not, there is an ongoing contest where you can be randomly selected to take one home for a couple of nights The company is still growing There is room to move geographically within Service, since Tesla owns the Service Centers Lots of “car guy” coworkers to keep conversations interesting Benefits actually got better and cheaper every year from 2012-2015, and stayed similar after that. I guess this was due to the company growing and getting better group rates. Regardless, not many people can say that. You’ll frequently come to work that day expecting to work on a certain project and end up on something totally different. This can be good and bad. Starting hours are typically flexible, which is a really nice perk. Nobody is making sure you’re in your seat at a certain time. Most employees are surprisingly responsive and friendly. Very heavy email-based communication, and it mostly works quite well. You get good at doing the best you can with the resources you have, rather than doing the best possible job. This isn’t necessarily a complaint, since it’s a valuable skill to have, but you should consider if you’re going to be okay in that kind of environment before applying.

Cons

Rare to be recognized, let alone thanked, for going above and beyond to accomplish something out of the ordinary. Once you've "done the impossible", it's just assumed that you can and will do it again and again from now on. Literally hundreds of people in one room, desks on top of each other, as many as possible in every little space. Companies claim that they’re being “modern” and “progressive” by not having offices and cubicles, but they’re just being cheap. Look at pictures of offices from the 1950’s. You’ll see the same hundreds of desks in a room. Yearly raises are typically less than the cost of living Work/life balance is mediocre at best Smallish yearly bonuses in the form of golden handcuffs. RSUs that vest over 4 years, so you’ll wait a long time to benefit from them Those who were hired before mid-2013 made a lot of money off stock options, but many of those people are leaving now that all of their options are used up. Revolving door. It’s hard to last more than a couple of years here. It’s always seemingly a few steps away from massive failure Very few processes in place, so work is done extremely inefficiently Very common to compose an email and see “This is no longer a valid Tesla address” The entire Service organization shares one budget. I am scrimping to save $50 on software while a barely-related manager wastes literally tens of thousands of dollars a week on cool toys, and it all comes from the same place. Everything’s urgent, and people try to name-drop that Elon’s watching this very project so I need to stop everything for them. Luckily those of us who have been around for a while see right through that charade. Technically, no 401(k) match, though if you’re careful with the health benefits you choose, you can end up with some leftover that can be diverted into the 401(k). Middle managers are very hit-and-miss. Many were promoted because a manager was needed and they were the only one who knew anything about the department. Much room for improvement here. Minimal leadership training. No real employee development opportunities. The results are just as bad as you’d expect. Massive inter-departmental struggles. Most of my problems can be traced to one power-hungry manager of a sister department. It only takes one person to ruin the work lives of many people. There are more meetings than I expected from this kind of company. Elon sent a great email about how wasteful meetings are, but people have fallen into old bad habits. Completely ineffective HR department Every department is grossly understaffed, just barely above the point of collapse. Nearly everyone has to work harder than they would if they were doing the same job at another company. Anything that they can do in house, they’ll do, rather than outsourcing to a supplier. There are people who spend their whole careers deciding “make vs. buy”… no need for them here, it seems. This is corporate arrogance, and it reduces quality, wastes human resources, and slows time to market in many cases. A positive side effect is that more products are made here in California than would be if they were outsourced. Inadequate parking Note to hiring managers at other companies: Watch out if someone from Tesla has “Project Manager” on their title. Many of these people are just general office workers with no skills beyond harassing people via email.

1429
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All