Bad Leadership, Good people. - Middle Manager TetraScience Employee Review

2.0
6 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Has potential as the product is really needed by the Pharma industry. The industry, product, and people are great. Smart people building trying to build a good product (if leadership can support and get out of the way).

Cons

- Constantly misses sales target. - Bad C-Level leadership....for example, key founder and C-Level who doesn't know how to lead or build enterprise SaaS solution. - No career advancement. They treat people as if they should be thankful to be working for them and keep piling on more work without acknowledging successes with promotions or salary increases. - Below market salaries and benefits.

Explore other reviews about TetraScience

5.0
31 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong culture of collaboration Exciting field

Cons

Operating in uncertainty Lack of structure

1.0
1 May 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Interesting industry space for a start up

Cons

My experience with Tetrascience was one of the most negative I’ve had in my career. The core issue is leadership there is a clear lack of professionalism, emotional intelligence, and basic respect for employees. Certain managers communicate in ways that feel openly hostile, including raising their voices and creating an environment driven by fear rather than collaboration. The culture is deeply problematic. Employees are expected to deliver under constant pressure without support, recognition, or appropriate compensation. It often feels like leadership prioritizes control and output over people, which leads to burnout and disengagement. There is little to no effort to create a healthy or sustainable work environment. Compensation and benefits are also well below expectations. The absence of a 401(k) and meaningful bonus structure is a major red flag, especially given the demands placed on employees. The interview process reflects the same lack of respect. Candidates are required to go through long, tedious, multi-hour interviews, only to be ignored afterward with no follow-up or closure. It shows a disregard for candidates’ time and effort that mirrors how employees are treated internally. Overall, this is not an environment where people are set up to succeed. Without major changes in leadership behavior and company culture, it’s difficult to recommend working here. * Toxic leadership and poor communication * Disrespectful and high-pressure culture * Weak benefits (no 401k, no bonus) * Disorganized and inconsiderate interview process

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All