employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

The Alan Turing Institute

Engaged employer

Very good place to be - Manager The Alan Turing Institute Employee Review

4.0
8 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great people - most people are friendly and warm around you. It’s a flat structure and most seniors are very approachable. The research is quite exciting when you think of the possibilities for impact and the institute has close relations with the government being a national institute. Maximum work/life balance; one of the best you may find around. The salary is above standards for the 3rd sector - the pay is very good. Lots of learning if you’re not phased by change. There’s also the freedom to design your work however you like as long as you deliver - no one is breathing down your neck. Being an ethnic minority I’d say I am very comfortable here and feel respected for the value I bring.

Cons

Ongoing restructuring which is unsettling for many. The vision is quite blurry and there’s no crystal clear direction. Processes are a mess to be honest, but not to be unexpected for an organization that’s been only there for 10 years. Growth opportunities are very limited.

Explore other reviews about The Alan Turing Institute

5.0
25 May 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Top notch projects of national importance, great group of people.

Cons

Location should be changed. They should build their own campus.

1.0
24 May 2026
Anonymous contractor
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Free low quality coffee, 30 days annual leave - if you can take them - but you'll need un

Cons

A duplicitous organisation that pretends to be woke whilst treating most staff like trash. The pay and perks are terrible for the majority of staff and the redundancy payouts the lowest in the UK. They also expect notice to be worked without discussion. Current staff best look for work ASAP or just leave to save your sanity. Anyone joining should really think twice. No one senior wants to make a decision or is even capable, and every internal process is painful and inefficent. The senior execs received pay rises and are mostly over paid compared to other staff, and yet its the productive lower paid staff who get the chop. Nice. Even their funder, UKRI was surprised by recent Exec pay rises. The research is mostly second tier with partners looking elsewhere, and who can blame them. The only question is, does the new CEO know how dysfunctional this place really is?

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All