employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Trinity Life Sciences

Engaged employer

Grew Too Fast And Can’t Catch Up - Associate Director Trinity Life Sciences Employee Review

2.0
29 Jan 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Non management is comprised of some of the best people out there.

Cons

The company grew too fast and still acts like it’s under 300 people. There are a dozen ways to do things with no standardization, Most leadership have only ever worked at Trinity (20+ years) so their ideas and methodology are extremely out dated and they have a very hard time embracing change at even a small level. Too much time on crafting PowerPoints on why you have to have a PowerPoint for a PowerPoint.

avatar
Trinity Life Sciences Response
2y
Thank you for giving your perspective - we completely understand that growth comes with it's challenges, and change management can be tricky at all levels and tenure. We will continue to consider varying perspectives as we adjust with our growth, as we know that's how the best decisions are made! - Sarah Zeoli

Explore other reviews about Trinity Life Sciences

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong cross-functional collaboration across teams, with a genuine openness to feedback and iteration. There’s meaningful opportunity to shape processes, frameworks, and go-to-market materials, so your work can have real impact. You get exposure to strategic initiatives and leadership conversations beyond your immediate role. The team is made up of thoughtful, capable colleagues who care about delivering high-quality work, and there’s a consistent focus on improving and refining outputs.

Cons

With continued growth, there is an opportunity to further mature and standardize processes to drive greater consistency and efficiency at scale. Enhancing clarity around frameworks and cross-functional alignment will further strengthen execution as priorities continue to evolve.

3.0
13 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good projects, great infrastructure, great resources, strong focus on culture

Cons

Terrible staffing model, both for junior associates (2-3 projects) and for senior consultants (3-4 projects) and engagement managers (upto 6 projects). Rapid churn of senior leadership over the past 6 months. Terrible training and level setting for associates, leaving the consultants and senior consultants too heavily overworked, and engagement managers thread bare

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All