Great experience - Recruiting Coordinator Verisk Employee Review

5.0
18 Dec 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I have thoroughly enjoyed my experience here so far! The company offers a fantastic flexible schedule, allowing for a great work-life balance. Leadership is very understanding and clear, always providing the necessary guidance while trusting employees to work autonomously. One of the things that stands out the most is the company's strong core values, which are seamlessly integrated into all aspects of the business—whether it’s in our programming, employee benefits, or day-to-day operations. It’s clear the goals of the organization which provides and supportive environment where employees can thrive.

Cons

As with any job, there are occasional challenges but no significant cons so far just traffic to the office and cost associated with parking.

avatar
Verisk Response
1y
Greetings, we appreciate your input! Thank you for sharing your experience regarding the work-life balance at Verisk. We greatly appreciate your positive feedback and are thrilled to hear that our commitment to maintaining a healthy work-life balance has positively impacted your experience.. We are also happy to hear that you are pleased with the leadership team. Should you have any further feedback or suggestions on how we can continue to improve , please reach out to HR.

Explore other reviews about Verisk

5.0
1 Jul 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people are awesome, the culture is strong, and they are terrific career opportunities.

Cons

Getting a little too “doing more with less” happy at the moment

2.0
30 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people. I worked with genuinely talented, hardworking colleagues who showed up for each other and for the work, even when leadership made that hard.

Cons

Leadership at the senior level was chaotic and unclear, and it trickled down into everything. Projects routinely landed with little to no notice, leaving teams scrambling instead of planning. Budgets were micromanaged from the top while strategic direction was not — a strange mix of tight control over spending and almost no clarity on priorities. Communication from senior leadership rarely made it down to the people actually doing the work, so teams were often the last to know about decisions that directly affected them. There was also a clear undercurrent of fear among some senior leaders that discouraged any real innovation or experimentation — better to play it safe than propose something new. If you're someone who thrives on clarity, planning, and a culture that rewards new ideas, this is not that environment.

1
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All