A Mixed Bag - Anonymous employee ZGF Architects Employee Review

3.0
23 Sept 2018
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Lots of high profile clients and incredibly knowledgeable staff, the people at this firm really know their stuff. The company has lots of resources in-house, and so you won’t go wanting in that department. The starting pay is higher than most places—but the raises can be meager in comparison, so it more or less evens out. The understaffing does come with the benefit that you’ll have to wear multiple hats, so you will learn a lot. The firm has a diverse portfolio of projects in some very resilient market sectors, so the fear of job loss is slim. Overall ZGF is a great place to grow, despite the frustrations.

Cons

The project I worked on required insane hours; I pulled 60-80 hour weeks on average for about 10 months. During that time I was doing documentation and presentation work. The middle management seems a bit bloated, with managers whose sole role is to manage managers. The culture is really left wanting, it feels a bit soulless working here—people often get caught up with the, albeit important, technical and logistical aspects of architecture and design often takes a seat on the back burner. There are a few egos in the office, but there’s no clear culture built around design, so if this is something you value it can be a frustrating place to be.

Explore other reviews about ZGF Architects

5.0
20 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great work culture, people and city and sense of belonging

Cons

Can't think of anything in terms of the internship experience

2.0
27 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Strong design culture and reputation: The firm has a clear commitment to design excellence, sustainability, and high-quality work across project types and scales. Highly talented colleagues: The day-to-day experience of working with peers was a major strength. Many designers are thoughtful, skilled, and deeply engaged in the work. Meaningful project work: Opportunities to contribute to complex, high-quality architecture and urban design projects with strong design ambition. Supportive professional community: A generally strong sense of community and collaboration at the peer level, with opportunities to learn from experienced designers.

Cons

Inconsistent leadership communication: Direction and feedback from senior leadership could be unclear or vary significantly, which sometimes made expectations difficult to navigate. Highly variable leadership culture: Project experience was strongly dependent on individual leadership styles, which could lead to inconsistent team environments across different projects. Challenging team dynamics at the senior level: Some leadership behaviors contributed to high-stress working conditions and negatively affected team morale and continuity. Opaque advancement pathways: Career progression was not always clearly defined, and feedback did not consistently translate into transparent development or promotion criteria. Impact on retention and morale: Variability in leadership and project environments sometimes contributed to elevated turnover and reduced team stability

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All