employer cover photo

FutureSense Foundation

Is this your company?

FutureSense Foundation Reviews

3.4

63% would recommend to a friend

(22 total reviews)

61% positive business outlook

FutureSense Foundation has an employee rating of 3.4 out of 5 stars, based on 22 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The FutureSense Foundation employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

22 reviews
5.0
8 Aug 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) societal contribution 2) Increase employable skills 3) Well supportive staff 4) professional development 5) better networking 6) Work overseas and different culture understanding. 7) Motivation and support for work.

Cons

Lack of in country staff Salary is less as compared to other jobs

5.0
8 Aug 2022

Passionate, caring, global community striving to make a difference.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The FutureSense Foundation provides an opportunity to work with a team committed to building a global community and striving to make a difference. The whole team is built of passionate, caring, motivate, enthusiastic and empathetic individuals. The benefits of working with FutureSense Foundation includes, but is no limited to the below. - The opportunity to travel across the different hubs - Working on a global platform with colleagues from around the world - Being able to bring your own ideas to life - Seeing the impact first hand of the projects overseas - Seeing the impact of programmes on UK and Australian participants and helping them grow as Global Citizens - High energy environment enabling colleagues to challenge each other to grow and strive - Flexible working - Good holiday allowance - Time in lieu for work/life balance - Fun and supportive team - Huge opportunity for growth as the organisation is an an exciting period of growth following the pandemic. Personally, I have had the opportunity to grow throughout my 5 years and despite some days being challenging, love every minute of working with my colleagues across the globe, and speaking with students to find out how they have been positively impacted by this project.

Cons

- Working globally means working across multiple time zones which isn't a problem but you should be prepared to be flexible because of this. - There isn't always enough time in the day to bring all your ideas to life so you must know how to manage your time and prioritise your tasks. If you can do this, then there isn't a problem.

1.0
11 Mar 2024
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Potentially, you could buid pretty good relationships with local partners and international connections (only if getting through upper management poor decision making when infringing local agreements). Someone in entry level jobs, can easily climb up the hierarchy, still with a low paying salary. Local communities are wonderful to work with,

Cons

Challenges Abroad recruits international volunteers, what they sell impacts how local hubs are to be managed. Local country hubs are not autonomus, neither is their job a priority because it must adapt to what Challenges Abroad is offering. In conclusion, local decisions are dependent on what Challenges abroad can sell, not dependent on community needs. All the local country work is to justify what challenges abroad sells, there is no interest in progressing on the positive impact in long term, and there is no interesnt in listening to the results of the local teams work concerning community needs (even if there are promisses that say the contrary). There is no work life balance, excesive hours are put into work that are not valued. It is more a model to meet a checklist of deliverables that Challenges Abroad can use to recruit volunteers. The constant staff rotation exhausts local teams in endlessly training new hires. Local hubs work is not valued because it is more important to do what the CEO asks for, even if it goes against local agreements, benefit and impact. The Ceo and uppermanagement have no clue of all the work that is done locally, thus continously underestimade local work, by asking for things that can take days or weeks to produce, in addition to the demanding regular work. There is limited funding to work, a constant issue is the kind of services that local hubs can provide given that international institutions inject large funds. This is not transparent between FSF and CA. The Ceo and HQ core leading team has a manipulative approach, selling you the best so that staff can accept "new exciting adventures", and once you accept, they forget about you, because the employee is not their concern, constant phrases such as "this person is so fantastic to work with, is a very experienced person and you will have the opportunity to grow along..." or "this is wonderful and unique opportunity for you, and you are the best fit for it...", etc., their manipulative approach is based on convincing promises and praising you. Consider a red flag whenever you are being praised, that means they want something from you sooner or later. There is always this fake smile and soft calm tone, as part of their manipulation, careful! Try to be as realistic as possible, This institution is not reliable. Finally, the CEO is a highly authoritarian leader who won't listen nor pay attention to local hubs needs nor impacts in the community; CEO has a very old fashioned leadership style that is tearing down FutureSense foundation, consider FutureSense to be just an image to cover what is behind the poor leadership and what $$ Challenges Abroad needs to recruit. Contracts condition you to give a 2 - 3 month notice before you leave the institution this is supposed to be met by employer and employee, but if they fire you, they can do it with less than 24 hour notice, and this is not in the contract. The only unfair reason to get fired is when it is reasonable to the CEO (imagine any scenario). They don't follow the own agreements/contracts that they sign, and in addition, how the institution operates in each country is fishy, it is not legally registered in some of them, there can be issues when it comes to declare taxes and pay. All that involves contract violations, labor violations and staff abuse, will be nicely covered up through the sugarcoating manipulative ways that are a best practice in upper management

Viewing 1 - 3 of 22 Reviews

Glassdoor has 29 FutureSense Foundation reviews submitted anonymously by FutureSense Foundation employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if FutureSense Foundation is right for you.