Innodata Reviews

3.6

64% would recommend to a friend

(860 total reviews)
avatar

Jack S. Abuhoff

73% approve of CEO

63% positive business outlook

Innodata has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 860 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Innodata employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

860 reviews
1.0
5 Apr 2024

Third class company

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

If you can keep buttering higher management, go ahead, they will promote you 5 times in 6 months.

Cons

1. Mega hiring and firing. 2. Will leave in high and dry after your probation. 3. They hire people nd after completion of probation, they fire people so they don't have to make them permanent. 4. Higher up have no idea what is going on, they are making managers within the team who have no experience, make ur life miserable. 5. Horrible favourism via managers. 6. They show minimal experience in thir works. 7. Even u qualified there interview, for each projects, there will be 3 rounds of test with 90% scoring criteria. There will training in terms of showing pets. Projects will me 2 weeks to 6 weeks long, but only for 1 day poor performance, they will hand you over PIP plan. Performance depends on quality, time management, occupancy in client portal, number of clicks and blah blah. Even only one parameter is down for one project for one day, they will give you their patent mail "Your service is terminated due to unsatisfactory performance " So, pls don't join. U will not be able to sleep for one day. "

2.0
11 May 2024

Worst Management

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1)Salary is credited on time 2) Flexible working as remote

Cons

1)There's a lack of understanding regarding the technical aspects within the company. 2)You'll be left high and dry once your probation period ends. 3)They recruit individuals, and upon completion of their probation, terminate them to avoid permanent employment. 4)Senior management is disconnected from operations, promoting inexperienced managers within teams who create a miserable work environment. 5)Managers show blatant favoritism, creating a toxic workplace culture. 6)Despite claiming to specialize in AI, they lack basic knowledge of algorithmic functioning. 7)Even if you pass their interview, each project entails three rounds of testing with a 90% pass rate requirement. Training consists mainly of trivial demonstrations. Projects typically last from 2 to 6 weeks, yet even a single day of poor performance can result in a 8)Performance Improvement Plan (PIP) being issued. Employees are arbitrarily assigned to projects and are susceptible to termination at any moment.

2.0
17 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Salaries were credited on time. There was also exposure to a variety of AI and LLM related projects, which could benefit early career professionals looking to gain broad experience.

Cons

The work environment was often chaotic and extremely high-pressure. KPIs were unrealistic, and employees were expected to meet demanding performance standards with minimal training, even after being shifted to completely different projects. Raising concerns about tools or workflows was routinely dismissed or blamed on the employee. There was little consistency across teams, and the appeals process for quality reviews rarely worked in time to make a difference. In some cases, employees were told their roles were being elevated, but salaries remained the same despite the added workload. Many ended up working 10–12 hour days for the same entry-level pay. Leaves were very difficult to get approved, even for health-related reasons. Instead of allowing time off, the company often asked employees to simply “work less” that day but still meet targets. If there were any technical issues, even completely out of your control, you were still expected to make up the hours later in the week. Overtime was paid, but people were sometimes guilt-tripped into agreeing to it. Firings happened without warning or proper process. Overall, there was no transparency, consistency, and basic support systems needed for long-term growth or stability.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 860 Reviews

Glassdoor has 1,000 Innodata reviews submitted anonymously by Innodata employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Innodata is right for you.