IntoUniversity Reviews

3.6

62% would recommend to a friend

(115 total reviews)

Rachel Carr

73% approve of CEO

62% positive business outlook

IntoUniversity has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 115 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The IntoUniversity employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

115 reviews
2.0
9 Aug 2023

Not a sustainable role

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Some programmes worked great to support students from disadvantaged backgrounds and working on the frontline made sure that staff were able to see the reward of their hard work. It was also great to have an opportunity to manage a strand, this is great experience especially for people who have just graduated and are looking to gain many skills.

Cons

Unfortunately with this role, there are more disadvantages than advantages. I stayed within this role for 7 months before I could really sense myself burning out and beginning to face mental health issues and decided to leave. The training is very long and tiring, I felt like I definitely learnt more whilst doing the job rather than the long training. Even after training and working the job, I still felt unprepared and was thrown into doing things that I had never heard of before without any support. This role really did impact my confidence and I have left feeling super unconfident and now starting a new job, I am constantly questioning myself and my abilities. No one in the centre had time to answer questions, support learning or even being kind to one another when struggling. A sense of promoting teamwork is supposed to fix all teamwork issues but this is not the case. I felt unsupported, spoke to my manager who also did not have time and would constantly take work home due to the overarching demands and asked for help. Your experience will heavily depend on your team, you end up spending so many hours a day with them and this can be a nightmare if you don't get on. It is almost near impossible to get some time to yourself whilst your at work for example, if you're dealing with a safeguarding concern and feel like you need some time to just breathe, good luck to finding the time! Safeguarding cases can be emotionally draining on top of everything else you have to deal with. You are forced to socialise constantly which again, on top of everything can be extremely draining. You will meet with your cluster and be expected to constantly network. This job is not for introverts! Head office are apparently constantly looking for feedback but when you resort to give feedback, nothing comes from this which is why people use platforms such as this to provide feedback, hoping that something will improve for the charity so they can continue focusing on young people but also staff well-being which is drastically neglected. You cannot discuss feedback in your teams without the superiors trying to turn everything 'positively' even when you are dealing with the worst of the worst. It got to a point where I could not discuss how I felt due to this toxic positive culture. An example is in our cluster meetings, we would usually discuss successes and challenges and recently this had changed to just successes - so people could not share their experiences although as education workers, you could just tell who was unhappy and fed up of this role! I have worked for Charities previously before however, working for IntoUniversity made me feel like I never want to come back and work for a charity. You are constantly expected to give and give until you do burn out. So many staff I had conversations with felt exactly the same but no space to discuss this so solutions could be sought. Everything was hidden by seniors to education workers, (I was discouraged to tell people when I was leaving), you were not involved in centre wide discussions and were made to feel inferior and useless. Moreover, the work-life balance is absolutely awful. Early starts were a norm and hardly getting a 1 hour lunch break. WFH was an option 1 day a month which was also very difficult to actually get approved due to everyone being overworked and if one person was not in centre this would cause chaos. Also, using 5 days of your holiday during Christmas was very unfair. Lastly, I really do hope well for this Charity and really want the charity to do well but changes need to be made otherwise this turnover which continue and continue.

avatar
IntoUniversity Response
2y
Hello, Thank you for sharing your honest feedback. This is something we take very seriously. We are working hard to constantly improve as an organisation and feedback like this helps us do this. Please do email me at hr@intouniversity.org if you'd like to talk about any of your experiences, Hannah
1.0
1 Mar 2023

Cult-like

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- the children are great to work with - fellow ed workers were friendly

Cons

- long hours in questionable working conditions (most buildings are falling down and covered in mould) - extremely high staff turnover (we are talking about a hundred staff leaving out of three hundred staff network wide a year, the training cohorts see about 80 new employees on their graduate scheme a year without considering those who are hired after the cohort recruitment) without any changes made to ensure employee retention - ridiculously low pay - felt like working in a cult - questionable safeguarding procedures with the outcomes not always best for the child - little room for career progression, career opportunities above education worker were senior education worker (one year of service required equalled in an extra £1000 in yearly salary before tax, centre leader at £32,000, dismal pay for the actual requirements of the job) -really long notice periods required to give when leaving (around 2 months) - training extremely long winded (it could've been done over two weeks instead of four) and largely inapplicable to the role and was pedantic and condescending - independent thinking strongly discouraged, everything is set out for you leaving no room for things to be done in a more efficient or independent way - company 'values' are cult like and are not open to discussion or deliberation, they have to be followed with no room to question the impact or assess the harm that they could inflict. - Values are constantly preached yet they are never extended or considered in relation to individual staff needs - cold calling was a large part of the job - 5 days of the holiday allowance has to be taken at Christmas when the centres close for two weeks or alternatively, unpaid leave -CEO is unapproachable whilst claiming to be heavily involved within the charity - no time in lieu offered for constantly working over agreed hours and short lunch breaks -minimal amount of staff were aged over 35, most staff were in their early twenties.

2.0
30 Aug 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The overarching aims of the charity are good and important, and impact reports show that there is real impact to the work we do. The model of working with the community in local centres means that an IU centre can be a really important part of the young peoples' lives. The young people and families we work with are genuinely wonderful. You can build positive relationships and feel that you are able to have an impact. In centres you get to work with some excellent, passionate, and hardworking staff. The skills and experience you gain from this role can be transferrable into other jobs and careers.

Cons

The wellbeing of Education Workers in general across the charity is low. Working days are long (9:30-6 with an enforced one hour unpaid lunch break). Staff are consistently expected to work outside of these hours, for example by starting early for workshops, and working through unpaid lunch on trips. Most working weeks involve unpaid work, which can make you feel that your time is not valued. There is no TOIL policy, only a 'discretionary day' scheme (a few extra days of annual leave at Christmas) which is unfit for purpose for delivery staff who consistently work overtime. Staff workload is high, with limited structures in place to alleviate workload. Centre staff juggle multiple programmes alongside heavy admin and an extremely busy delivery schedule. Teams are small, and one person being away (due to sickness, annual leave, or an unfilled position, which happens frequently) makes the workload even more unmanageable. Centres desperately need more staff, but SLT has no plans to do this, regardless of staff consistently raising this as an enormous issue. I have found there to be an attitude of toxic positivity at IU, where saying something negative about the organisation or your working conditions is frowned upon. There is a culture of 'just get on with it' and 'this is just the way we do things here'. SLT frequently cite the organisational values which often do not feel reflected in the way that delivery staff are treated. The graduate scheme is really not a scheme at all - it is a graduate job with limited opportunities for progression and development. You are trained for five weeks (in London, which is very inconvenient if you don't live/work in London) and then set off on the job, rather than in a graduate scheme-style programme of training and development. This can be very frustrating, as you can feel that you aren't developing or growing.

avatar
IntoUniversity Response
2y
Hello, Many thanks for your feedback. We're always keen to hear feedback which helps us to review and improve how we do things. We're sorry your experience at IntoUniversity was not more positive. If you'd like to discuss any of your concerns in more detail, please email me at hr@intouniversity.org. Best wishes, Hannah
Viewing 1 - 3 of 115 Reviews

Glassdoor has 135 IntoUniversity reviews submitted anonymously by IntoUniversity employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if IntoUniversity is right for you.