employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Mercy For Animals

Is this your company?

Mercy For Animals Reviews

2.9

40% would recommend to a friend

(74 total reviews)

Leah Garces

43% approve of CEO

25% positive business outlook

Mercy For Animals has an employee rating of 2.9 out of 5 stars, based on 74 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The Mercy For Animals employee rating is 22% below average for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

74 reviews
1.0
6 Jan 2024

Animal Tourism Organisation That Belongs To The Dustbin of Animal Rights

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

You get to work with some people who have integrity and are really kind.

Cons

1. White centric organisation with a president that pretends to care about humans and animals but can’t really walk the talk. 2. Micromanagement, incompetence and lack of transparency and resources provided to regional teams. 3. They talk of diversity when I can hardly spot a few African Americans; they exist merely because of tokenism. Diversity lacking in other regions too and leadership is in the hands of some very problematic people.

1.0
20 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work remote. Good amount of PTO.

Cons

When I started at MFA it was a fun, creative, innovative work environment. The organization was making very real changes in the farmed animal space. Undercover investigations were released often, lawsuits against animal abusers were filed, and corporate victories were frequent. Furthermore, the leadership of the organization supported the mission and empowered employees. Over time the organization’s culture crumbled. There were sexual harassment scandals and constant leadership shakeups. To make matters worse, MFA’s founder and current board President has created a culture of fear. In one full sweep he removed the leadership that cared about employees and the mission, and replaced them all with corporate cronies who could care less about making difference for farmed animals. What’s more, this current leadership laid off staff while giving themselves raises and promotions, and have furthered Milo’s culture of fear. Additionally, the HR department and current President failed to take action when an American employee made blatant racist remarks about staff in Mexico on an organizational wide call. They also dragged their feet when multiple staffers filed complaints about another staffer who assisted a known sexual predator spy on his victims. Quite frankly, it’s appalling that a social justice group would allow these things to occur. During my time at MFA I watched countless devoted activists who cared deeply about making a change for animals be bullied, harassed, lied to, and essentially pushed out of the movement. Current leadership is power hungry, egotistical, and self serving. If you care about helping animals I would NOT recommend working at MFA ... I honestly don’t even think anyone in leadership cares about the mission — including MFA’s founder, Milo Runkle.

avatar
Mercy For Animals Response
7y
MFA appreciates honest feedback and employer reviews from all current and former team members. Unfortunately, this review gives an inaccurate impression that we would like to correct. A recent survey of our team members indicated that the majority of team members feel motivated and supported by their teams, team leaders, and leadership. It is misleading to state that “current leadership laid off staff while giving themselves raises and promotions.” A very small number of positions were eliminated from the new organizational structure to better align our focus and to work toward our strategic goals within budget constraints. Additionally, a small number of team members, across all levels of the organization, were promoted and received small market increases. MFA prioritizes pay equity, and compensation analysis is an ongoing process to ensure we are paying fair and competitive wages. MFA has and will always take very seriously any claims of racism or harassment, including opening investigations where appropriate and taking action, including disciplinary action up to termination. Milo Runkle is a well-known and respected farmed animal advocate. All members of the MFA leadership team are vegan and passionate about animal rights and welfare. Yes, it is true that some of our newer leaders come to us with impressive business backgrounds - a strategic move on our part to align our values and mission with the business acumen and know-how to execute our strategic plan successfully, with the ultimate goal being to create a world where animals are respected, protected, and free to pursue their own interests. We wish all former team members the best in the next chapter of their journey. MFA is and will continue to be a leader in the farmed animal rights movement, thanks to our passionate team members and supporters.
1.0
7 Mar 2019

What a nightmare. So glad I’m gone.

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Ability to work remotely or from home if local.

Cons

I’ve seen this organization permit and propagate bullying, racism, employee targeting, and gaslighting; truly shocking from a place that calls itself a social justice organization. Additionally, as others have mentioned, in a year where funding plummeted due to scandal and a subsequent major deterioration of the org’s reputation, senior leadership laid off entry-level staffers making humble salaries while promoting themselves and giving themselves raises. It’s beyond the pale. In other nonprofits, leaders making the most have been known to take pay cuts in lean years to ensure no one loses their jobs. MFA does the opposite. To make matters worse, in their 2019 restructure (the second major one in under a year) they demoted longtime staffers for no reason other than it didn’t fit their “business model.” This created a level demoralization and confusion I’ve never encountered before in my professional life. The inept and tone deaf senior leadership team keep saying everyone is happy and things are great according to their surveys. I don’t believe it. I’ve heard from many people still employed at the organization who are completely beat down and scared to death of losing their jobs, especially in the wake of the lay-offs. What’s more, seven staffers have quit in just the last two weeks. I’ve never seen a leadership team be so out of touch, act with such negligence, and treat its staff so poorly. It’s devastating and totally beneath the animal rights movement.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 74 Reviews

Glassdoor has 94 Mercy For Animals reviews submitted anonymously by Mercy For Animals employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Mercy For Animals is right for you.