NCCER Reviews

2.2

37% would recommend to a friend

(54 total reviews)
avatar

Boyd Worsham

33% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

NCCER has an employee rating of 2.2 out of 5 stars, based on 54 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have an average working experience there. The NCCER employee rating is 41% below average for employers within the Education industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

54 reviews
4.0
3 Jul 2026

Great team support but communication and career path issues hinder growth

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The people you will immediately work with (my experience is from Product Development) will feel like your work family. They will make hard days feel fun, they are organized, and they all excel at what they are hired to do. Its been a blessing to work with them. Good Mission. Good work/life balance. Good bonuses. Good location.

Cons

The company work culture is divided into an upper floor and a lower floor. A lot of times, There is not much communication on decisions being made from upper management which makes a lot of the projects arriving to production feel like a knee-jerk, last-minute decision that results in an inconsistent pace of work ranging from absolutely nothing in the pipe to an overwhelming batch of work with a suffocating timeline. Another point that I should mention is career growth opportunities feel a little stagnant. This said, I know that there is an active effort within management to address this pain point, so hopefully this changes soon.

2.0
1 Jul 2026

The Definitive NCCER Review

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- “Unlimited” PTO. This is without a doubt the best part of NCCER, but your experience with will vary greatly on who your direct supervisor is. Company boasts it as a selling point but it can quickly become an issue if you take what is deemed as “too much” time off. - 401K, retirement, and health insurance options are great. - Yearly, birthday, and anniversary bonuses. Amount will vary depending on tenure and position in the company. - Some phenomenal people here from entry-level to executive leadership. - NCCER has an important mission that does impact the lives of many and the future of the construction industry. - On-site gym and nature trails

Cons

- You will be gaslit, bullied, lied to, and blamed. Particularly the by the CEO. - Office morale and culture is terrible. I would equate it to World War 1 trench warfare. - Obvious bias against employees under the age of 40 from CEO and certain members of ELT - Don’t get too attached to the people next to you, because half of them will be gone within 12 months. - CEO sends HR to do a head count of people in cubes, mandatory daily sign-ins, and the CEO will watch who leaves the parking lot and when. - CEO has had several documented instances of blowups against departments or individuals, but HR (bless them for the impossible position they’re put in) has their hands tied and nothing ever happens. - If you speak up or defend yourself or others, you will be fired, punished or targeted. - Toxic positivity will be the response when you bring up issues with upcoming projects to executive leadership, but you will be expected to figure it out with no direction or clear goal. - Pay structure makes no sense. You will have individuals on the same team with similar experience levels and talents, but one is somehow making $10,000+ more than the other. Remote employee salaries are substantially more than in-office employees. - Remote/hybrid policy is a joke. If you aren’t in one of the ordained positions, or one of the “chosen”, you are expected in office every single day. People who live 60+ miles away have been forced to come in daily, while “chosen” individuals who live nearby are given full remote. Company doesn’t follow it’s own policy that’s in the employee handbook. - Blatant favoritism and nepotism plague this company. - Nearly every project will exceed expected budget by multiples. - Salaries are exceedingly low for many positions in the company, far below national or state averages. Under $45,000. - You will take on responsibilities that are out of your job scope and department, while whole departments or individuals in positions who should be doing the work are somehow absolved of all responsibility or blame, leading you to think: “If I’m the one doing this, what is that entire department/individual doing?” Spoiler alert: they’re doing nothing. - Insane amounts of turnover - No firm vision for many projects. You will be given no direction, conflicting orders, and the expectations will be either unstated or unreasonable. Somehow, you will complete that project to the best of you and your team’s ability just to be told: “we don’t like it.” Without specific feedback on what to improve or how to fix it. - Bad word of mouth (justified), bad office morale, and low salaries affects pool for open positions and local applicants. This leads to the company hiring more remote people, and giving them much higher salaries while in-office people are given no flexibility and significantly lower salaries.

avatar
NCCER Response
8h
We appreciate all employee feedback, even when it is critical, because it provides an opportunity to reflect, improve, and ensure we are holding ourselves accountable to our mission and values. That said, this review contains a number of highly subjective opinions, sweeping generalizations, and serious allegations presented as facts without context or supporting evidence. It is important to provide a balanced perspective for current and prospective employees. First, we are pleased that the reviewer acknowledged several strengths that are consistently highlighted by many employees, including our generous PTO program, comprehensive benefits package, retirement offerings, bonus program, wellness amenities, and, most importantly, our mission to support workforce development and the future of the construction industry. We are equally grateful for the many talented and dedicated employees—past and present—who contribute to that mission every day. Culture and Leadership The review repeatedly describes the organization and its leadership using terms such as "gaslighting," "bullying," "lying," and other inflammatory accusations. These are serious claims that should not be casually asserted. NCCER strives to maintain a professional, respectful workplace and has established multiple avenues through which employees can raise concerns, seek support, provide feedback, or report inappropriate behavior. Suggestions that employees are routinely punished for speaking up are inconsistent with the organization's efforts to encourage dialogue, collaboration, and accountability throughout the company. Like any organization experiencing growth, change, and evolving business demands, there will be times when decisions are unpopular, expectations are high, or employees disagree with leadership direction. Disagreement, performance accountability, or difficult conversations should not automatically be characterized as harassment or retaliation. Employee Morale and Turnover The assertion that morale is equivalent to "World War I trench warfare" is clearly hyperbolic and does not reflect the experience of many employees who continue to build long and successful careers at NCCER. While employee turnover occurs in every organization, characterizing the workforce as constantly revolving or suggesting that employees should not become attached to their colleagues is simply not an accurate representation of the company as a whole. The reality is that some employees leave for career advancement, relocation, personal reasons, changing professional interests, or opportunities that better align with their goals. At the same time, many employees remain with the organization for years and continue to contribute meaningfully to our mission. Age Bias, Favoritism, and Nepotism The review makes allegations of age discrimination, favoritism, and nepotism without providing any evidence. These are significant accusations that should not be made lightly. NCCER is committed to providing equal employment opportunities and making employment decisions based on qualifications, performance, business needs, and organizational objectives. No organization is perfect, and employees may occasionally disagree with personnel decisions. However, disagreement with a decision does not constitute proof of discrimination or favoritism. Attendance, Remote Work, and Workplace Expectations The review portrays standard workplace accountability measures as excessive surveillance. Organizations have a legitimate need to understand workforce attendance, maintain productivity, support collaboration, and ensure operational effectiveness. Expectations regarding office attendance, remote work arrangements, and hybrid schedules are established based on business needs, position requirements, team dynamics, and operational considerations. It is also important to recognize that remote and hybrid work decisions often vary based on workforce availability, specialized skill requirements, and organizational needs. These decisions are never as simple as geographic proximity or personal preference. Compensation The suggestion that compensation practices are arbitrary or irrational overlooks the reality that salaries are influenced by numerous factors, including market conditions, experience, specialized expertise, tenure, performance, certifications, geographic differences, and recruitment challenges. It is common across industries for employees with seemingly similar roles to earn different salaries due to these factors. Likewise, remote employees may sometimes be hired into positions that require specialized skills or operate within highly competitive labor markets. Salary differences alone should not be interpreted as evidence of unfair treatment. Project Management and Organizational Direction The review suggests that projects routinely exceed budgets, lack direction, and are plagued by conflicting priorities. Anyone who has worked in a mission-driven organization understands that projects can evolve, priorities can shift, and stakeholder feedback can change over time. While continuous improvement in planning, communication, and execution is always important, the assertion that nearly every project lacks direction or that entire departments contribute nothing is neither constructive nor credible. The success of NCCER's products, programs, credentials, assessments, workforce development initiatives, and industry partnerships would not be possible if employees and departments were broadly disengaged or ineffective. A More Balanced Perspective Like many organizations, NCCER has areas where it continues to improve. Employees may experience frustration with change management, communication, workload distribution, leadership decisions, or workplace policies. Those concerns deserve to be discussed professionally and addressed constructively. However, it is equally important to distinguish between legitimate workplace concerns and broad characterizations that paint every leader, department, policy, or decision in the most negative possible light. Doing so diminishes the contributions of the many dedicated employees who work hard every day to serve customers, industry partners, and one another. NCCER remains committed to fostering a professional workplace, investing in its employees, providing valuable benefits, supporting workforce development, and advancing a mission that has a meaningful impact on the construction industry. We welcome honest feedback and will continue working to strengthen the employee experience while remaining focused on the important work we do together.
5.0
29 Jun 2026

Solid Workplace with a Strong Mission

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

NCCER has a great mission to educate people and provide them career opportunities in the construction industry. A big majority of the people who work here are kind, helpful, hard-working and always happy to support their co-workers. The benefits (especially retirement and health savings accounts) are great. The office is very nice. There’s an on-site gym. They provide snacks and coffee. They do an employee lunch or happy hour once every couple months.

Cons

The work environment is not for everyone. If you have traditional employability traits (reliability, strong work ethic, prefer to work in-person, not overly focused on maximizing time off, etc.) you will do well and have opportunities to move up. If you need to work remotely or believe a company should allow you to take 2 or 3 months of time off every year, it will not be a good fit for you.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 54 Reviews

Glassdoor has 56 NCCER reviews submitted anonymously by NCCER employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if NCCER is right for you.