Recast Reviews

3.5

47% would recommend to a friend

(7 total reviews)

47% positive business outlook

Reviews by job title

7 reviews
3.0
9 Oct 2023
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good day-to-day environment. Nice office. Good parties too, for what thats worth now.

Cons

As of writing, Recast has just recently gone into administration, laid off its entire staff without our final paychecks, was purchased out of administration by a company called CTP - which was started and is part-owned by the CEO of Recast (the general sentiment in the office was that CTP was just a sort of off-shoot of Recast itself) - and has subsequently rehired half of its staff, again without compensating the still laid-off staff. In the coming days its expected to restart operation, all within a turnover of a little over two weeks, with the original CEO still in charge. None of this is insider knowledge, it can all be found online at this point, but i think there is value is stating that timeline in context. I shouldn't need to explain further just how shady this feels. This all feels like a round of layoffs with extra steps; shaking off any financial responsibility towards the laid-off staff while keeping the management team basically intact. It feels shifty and wrong, and forces me to suspect that this administration was predicted well ahead of time, even though it was made out to be a surprise, and the fact that the staff were not compensated (or even paid their final months wage) was a planned-for consequence.

5.0
8 Dec 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Great moral - Transparent communication from slt - Lovely office location - Really nice group of colleagues - Great mission overall - Good salary

Cons

- Hiring 10 new staff in the same month and then making 17 staff redundant. - Pizza thursday get old and there's better ways to look after staff. - Office is a bit drab

avatar
Recast Response
3y
Thank you for your comments. We're happy to hear you were largely satisfied working at Recast and will take your feedback onboard to improve in the future.
1.0
1 Nov 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1) Dog- friendly workplace 2) Salary range in job adverts is always specified which helps to reduce gender & other pay gaps 3) The engineering team (with the CTO), the finance team (with the CFO) and the COO are very experienced and brilliant . If left to them, they can turn the fortunes of the firm around.

Cons

1) A few insecure people in the senior leadership have instilled a blame culture and indulges in political power play which one usually associates with large organisations. I was surprised to see it in a startup. 2) The above point is epitomised by the marketing dept. who has built a big moat around them, have kicked out up-and-coming young talent, is a micromanager, is aggressively siloed, seeks credit when things go well and is adept at passing the buck when they don’t . Very skilled at blaming someone not in the room to defend themselves. It also explains why so much of their team’s work is outsourced to third parties – they are easier to point the finger at. 3) The firm spent a lot of money on rebranding , which was probably required but I felt the brand went from a bit cool to quite boring (the kind you see in a financial firm, not what you expect from a streaming platform). 4) They follow the ‘Get things done’ concept which is commendable, however the way you go about doing it is very important - it should be collaborative. Sadly, I found it to be too dictatorial, adversarial and pressurised especially for the engineering team. In my view this explains why they had a lot of initial success which led to the promotions of those who instilled this culture until it caught up with them up with them in the form of employee apathy, demoralisation and decline in quality. 5) There is a lot of unrealistic optimism from the CEO. For example, giving employees meaningless stock options one month because ‘we are doing very well’ and making them redundant the following month because ‘we are not doing so well’. And true to form- blames publishers rather their own decision making for the issues. 6) I joined despite knowing that the CEO's previous venture had failed and he had to make a lot of redundancies there. I felt that he must have learnt from that experience. My partner warned me against joining as she was wary of the setup. Wish I had listened. I got taken in by the optics and the speeches. Redundancies due to economic downturn and market forces are understandable, but that due to incompetency from the senior leadership and the uncaring way it was announced and implemented (the HR conveniently went on holiday for 2 weeks the day after it was announced) without any indication or warning was inexcusable. I won’t be surprised if a few in the leadership are dusting their CVs. I can't help but worry for ex-colleagues who became good friends in a very short time and all those who joined newly, believing in the firm. 7) The firm does optics very well - examples- a prime office location, parties , free snacks, drinks, coffee and pizza, unlimited holidays which nobody takes - all of which probably helps to hide the underlying issues. 8) I wish I had done some due-diligence on their private equity backers and had asked questions about their startup runway. 9) I still feel the business idea is great, however I also feel they have missed that window of opportunity where they could have made a real impact.

avatar
Recast Response
3y
We very much take your comments onboard, and we’re sorry to hear that your experience with us wasn’t always positive. Thank you for your feedback.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 7 Reviews

Glassdoor has 7 Recast reviews submitted anonymously by Recast employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Recast is right for you.