Wish I had taken note of some of the other reviews before applying. Staff turnover speaks for itself, with a median tenure shown on LinkedIn of only 1.8 years - shocking and way below industry average. A good question to ask is why. In my time there this was due to people leaving voluntarily. This speaks volumes.
Many claims are made about cutting-edge technology, however a sluggish, outdated platform with video and basic chat function is like the dark ages compared to other online companies and not particularly user-friendly for trainers. It was so frustrating that clients often wished to switch to Teams. Maybe this is the cutting-edge tech to which they refer!
Such a small client base after so many years was also rather strange, and with the high level of clients cancelling classes across the board it seemed rather odd. Trainers were blamed for cancellations, however, when all trainers were experiencing these and being forced to teach in a set way from set materials, maybe there is an issue elsewhere. Or maybe it was our fault, and we were all, without exception, terrible trainers. What seems most likely?
In my view, professionalism seemed to take second place to personal feelings, and running a business where decisions and communication seemed emotion-led or done with a knee-jerk reaction seems rather worrying and also incredibly unpleasant for trainers. Communication seemed to swing between over the top remarks and affection to silence and being given the cold shoulder. To me, it felt more like a toxic relationship than a workplace.
Leaving the company was the best decision I have made as treading on eggshells was no way to spend my working life.