employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Wisconsin Humane Society

Is this your company?

Wisconsin Humane Society Reviews

3.7

57% would recommend to a friend

(41 total reviews)

Anne Reed

73% approve of CEO

57% positive business outlook

Wisconsin Humane Society has an employee rating of 3.7 out of 5 stars, based on 41 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Wisconsin Humane Society employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Non-profit and NGO industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

41 reviews
3.0
13 Aug 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The organization has a great vision and philosophy, that much is certain. Working with the animals every day is great and is the biggest perk of working here. Adoptions are rewarding and it is fun helping clients find their new animal. It was always great getting updates of animals you personally adopted out, or that you had a bond with. The organization overall does well and means well. Depending on your specific supervisor/campus, you will have bi-weekly one on ones to discuss concerns, give/receive feedback and develop training goals. In addition, WHS is a "low kill" shelter which means animals are ONLY euthanized if there is something medically or behaviorally that can't be supported, NOT for time or space which is different from a lot of shelters, especially those down south. Lastly the organization has a great staff that are not directly involved with animal care that work to support the organization every day. The volunteer program is great, with volunteers being a major asset and benefit to the organization. The Pet’s for Life Program is an amazing thing that WHS is able to offer.

Cons

The organization for all that it does well, is not without its flaws. Ultimately, you need to decide whether or not these are things make working here worth it for you. First, do not expect training beyond the basic role to be easily accessible. The organization is notoriously bad when it comes to staff training and development, thereby creating high turnover. No matter how many emails, conversations and "one on ones" you have, further training is not a guarantee and your goals are subject to be changed at a moment's notice. It does not seem like the organization has a training framework beyond the basics. Your drive and desire to learn isn’t enough, but the criteria needed to develop is not explained, which can be frustrating. This is especially frustrating when you are struggling to grow, yet other staff are able to without any hurdle. Second, the animals are a major pro, but also can be the biggest con. Tons of animals come in and have live outcomes, but there are still some that do not. Animals are euthanized for medical/behavior reasons, but the deciding factors are not always clear to AC/ACT staff. The hardest to handle are the behavioral decisions because they are based on criteria that isn’t always accessible. Asking questions to the behavior staff can sometimes be met with resistance and aggravation, yet supervisors don’t always have the answers. This is particularly difficult when an animal you really like or have had great experiences with is unable to be placed due to a behavior concern you never experiences. With the inability to ask question and get answers to further understand how or why decisions were made, sometimes it just appears as though the deciding factor was whether the behavior department liked an animal or not. The behavior department will go above and beyond for some animals, whereas others are signed off right away despite similar situation. When you ask for more details, or for them to reconsider, they may get defensive. Third, work culture, training and experience will vary WIDELY among the campuses. Despite being the same organization, the campuses do not always communicate effectively. Each campus has its own quirks, and they are hard to understand if you haven’t experienced them first hand (i.e running out of space in RAC is much different than MKE). This lack of understanding and poor communication sometimes make it harder to support animals in care. Lastly, the job is emotional, especially for someone that cares about the organization and wants to do the best that can be done. There are plenty of positive feelings, but also many sad ones. If you are the type of person that can take in and process an emotional situation immediately, then you may be ok. If you are the type of person that has questions and can't let things go and move on easily, this is not the place for you.

avatar
Wisconsin Humane Society Response
6y
Our best work is achieved when staff are engaged, appreciated and heard, and we strive to maintain a healthy workplace. We appreciate this information and are following up on your concerns. We encourage all employees to provide feedback via the various channels available: talking to a supervisor, meeting with the human resources department, connecting with any member of the leadership team, submitting feedback to the CEO through the anonymous survey, etc. We all love this work and are inspired every day by the difference we are able to make for both animals and people. We will continue to strive to make improvements to staff communication and training, which can always be made better! Thank you for your time with us, as well as the feedback, which is always welcome.
2.0
21 Jul 2015
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I (at the time) had so much opportunity to learn about animal behavior, veterinary medicine, basic customer service skills, almost anything you want to learn about. Great benefits (except HR person is impossible to get a hole of). The people I worked with were AMAZING, knowing you are making a difference in peoples' and animals' lives is so rewarding.

Cons

HR person is the WORST person you will ever meet, impossible to get a hold of, will screw up your benefits and then lie about it. Seevral changes occured when I left, they got rid of "ACS" as a position, made everyone compete for one position or be demoted, no chance to move up anywhere because there's at least 20 people in front of you waiting who also haven't gotten anywhere. Worst thing is they have people become euthanasia certified so they can help in surgery but then won't let them assist in surgery and just have to euthanize animals (with no raise in pay until you're are 'on the license' which is a new policy). You basically clean up after dogs, have volunteers do all the fun things like giving meds or behavior evals, and get paid a mediocre wage w/ few (if any) raises.

1.0
10 Mar 2021

WHS review

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working with the animals is the only good part of the job.

Cons

This organization values two things: profit and public opinion. AC/ACTs are treated terribly and paid next to nothing, live outcomes and quality animal care are not top priorities for management, and there is no room for growth. They have an 'open door policy' so you're allowed to voice your concerns, however those concerns are never dealt with or improved. We are asked to do the impossible almost every day (for example, be in two places at once or take in more animals than we have space for) and it is exhausting. Since COVID, management has been able to work from home so there is often no supervisor on site which is unacceptable. Subpar employees are tolerated and even rewarded, while exceptional employees are ignored. Management is lazy and does not actually understand the demands of the job.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 41 Reviews

Glassdoor has 45 Wisconsin Humane Society reviews submitted anonymously by Wisconsin Humane Society employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Wisconsin Humane Society is right for you.