employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Xactware Solutions

Now known as Verisk

Is this your company?

Xactware Solutions Reviews

3.6

68% would recommend to a friend

(200 total reviews)

Mike Fulton

77% approve of CEO

59% positive business outlook

Xactware Solutions has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 200 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Xactware Solutions employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Information Technology industry (3.9 stars).

Reviews by job title

200 reviews
3.0
23 Jun 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good work-life balance - Great benefits package - Great support for education and personal development - Many great employees - Mostly great junior leaders - Good starting salaries - Nice facility in a good location

Cons

- Nepotism - Salary hardly increases over time (generally outpaced by inflation) - Not willing to pay enough to retain high-performers or highly experienced employees - Widespread lack of ownership and accountability among senior/middle leadership - Executives have no technological expertise - Managers are forced to give at least one negative yearly evaluation, which has harsh consequences - Low amount of respect for the QA discipline - Political games are the most effective way to get ahead - Slow to adopt modern business practices, effective software development strategies, and to respond to the marketplace - Consistently produces mediocre products - Long streak of failure in international markets

1.0
21 Jun 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Insurance benefits are decent. The monthly bonus is good, if you hit all of the requirements. The view over the valley is nice.

Cons

Strap in, because you're in for a roller coaster of a ride. Let's discuss the software we support. It's legitimately the buggiest software I have ever had the misfortune to work with. It's far too complicated for the average user and if you look at it wrong or blink when it doesn't want to, it will crash and you'll lose all of your work (and then will seemingly delete all of your projects the next time you're logged in while it's at it). Updates for the software only break it further. Sometimes an update will roll out that fixes one issue, but it will break a number of other needed features. I'm convinced that the development department is full of a bunch of monkeys just flinging their own poo around. They're a bunch of unqualified gits. Most of the time, when a major bug is found, they only offer workarounds that sometimes sort of skirt the issue. They've been getting better in the more recent months, but it's still awful. Not only are the dozen softwares we support too complicated for the average user, but training for said softwares, if it exists at all, is outdated and poorly crafted. Training for us as the support is virtually nonexistant as well. It's a trial by fire sort of thing. You'll be expected to support all of the features for several softwares you've never even heard of, let alone seen and used. When dealing with the main software, it will look and perform differently depending on which platform you're using it on, and if you're using it online, you'll need to be fluent in clearing your browser cache because for some godforsaken reason development thinks we're living in the 1990's still and can't develop for anything newer than Microsoft Silverlight. You'll have different login email addresses and passwords for everything as well, which adds to the potential confusion. Everything is so convoluted that not even the managers or leads know how or where to log in to do stuff. Let's move on to a critique of our customers. Let me make it known that the customers have a right to be frustrated when they have to deal with our dumpster fire of a software. But that does not excuse them from being downright abusive to us as they are. Our customers are rude, abusive, demanding, and refuse to do anything for themselves. I have never worked at a job where I can be verbally abused by multiple people at a time for my entire shift and not had anything done on my behalf (I'll get to that later, just you wait). Not only are our users demanding and verbally abusive, but almost every single one of them comes into chat multiple times a day because they just cannot figure it out. I partially blame the software for this, but an unwillingness to learn how to do something for yourself also contributes. Alright, time to criticize the management. It appears as though none of them know how to effectively read trend reports between weeks because we never have enough people working to meet our traffic, especially on the weekends. I have never dreaded going to work to the point it made me physically ill until working here and seeing I have to take the Saturday swing shift. Not only the Saturday swing shift though, it's every weekend shift. Coverage is dropped to anywhere between two and four people and if you need help with an issue, which you will, guaranteed, you need to call the on-call L3, who is often just as stressed as you with trying to juggle being on two to three other calls helping people. It's a lose-lose setup. The best way to describe it is actually only one word: HELL. So scheduling is poor at best. If you have any other obligations outside of work, get ready to kiss them goodbye. You're going to college? You can't adjust your work schedule, you'll need to drop out, never sleep, or pray to whichever deity you choose that the classes are offered late evening when you aren't chained to your rigid schedule. Think you can get homework done during your lunch break? Forget that too, because nine out of ten times, you'll have your lunch shortened or cut entirely because you're just not working hard enough to get the absurd customer traffic down. And if it's the busy season (which has become year-round), you not only get to work through your lunch and not leave early to make up for it, but you'll be asked and then required to pick up extra shifts. So now it's time to forget you have a family, because you'll never see them. On top of all of this, you're required to read articles, watch "training" videos, and take quizzes for new garbage softwares that Xactware is publishing (prematurely) once every few days (it used to be once a week or once a month). And then when you're finished with learning (ie "have heard of") the new software, you'll have more responsibilities tacked onto you to meet the needs of support for it. And then when you eventually promote to L2 on your free time that you won't get, you can add even more responsibilities. Long story shortened just a bit, customer traffic is increasing exponentially, and management is unable or unwilling to do anything about it. If you happen to find another position in the company away from support, there's a good chance that you will be arbitrarily held back from promoting on grounds that "support needs you." It's morally and ethically wrong. I don't think that the CEO is aware of what really goes on in support, and if he is, he doesn't care enough to do anything. You're getting closer to the end of my spiel. I've only got a couple other things I'd like to warn you about. SQA, also known as the group of people that grade your interactions with customers. One thing, is that the manager of them was hired because of nepotism, not qualification...and it shows. Nothing is set in stone. You'll lose points on your grades arbitrarily. Sometimes you'll lose points on something you've done in every interaction for over a year out of the blue, just enough to put you in danger of needing remedial coaching, and then never again. It's ridiculous. All-in-all, this is the worst job I've ever had and I wouldn't wish it upon my worst enemy. I can't tell you to not work here, but for the love of everything that is good in this world, if you have any self-respect, stay away. There are dozens, dozens of dozens, of other jobs that pay better for less. Jobs that don't make you want to jump through the inch-thick glass windows on the fourth floor every five minutes.

1.0
6 Aug 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Managers... will not demand hourly reporting. They're very friendly when you want to talk to them. There are a few good seeds (1 in 10 maybe) among middle management that seem to really know what they're doing. They're very helpful and do a great job. They do a good job of interacting with the employees, helping where they can and promoting high moral. Code... is kept in a buildable state at all times. Technology... is given and used when needed. Pro versions Profiles, analizers, extensions, plugins and everything you could want. They don't hold back when it comes to tech. Culture... is kinda quirky, but generally devs, qa, and automation engineers all get along real well and joke around a lot. The monthly team activities can be a ton of fun. Mostly everyone is pretty chill and fun do be around. Flexible work schedules are a huge benefit as well. Benefits... are mostly great. Good 401K match, good yearly bonus, flexible schedules, free fruit every morning, free snacks (if you can beat the rush). After a huge overtime fiasco, it's mostly look down on by managers, so it's rare now. Overall... If you can focus on the positive and ignore the negatives in life, you can have fun here.

Cons

Managers... are checked out (except the few good ones). They don't seem to care about anything unless upper management starts breathing down their necks. The few good ones tend to move around to avoid the drama and politics of one department for too long. Management tends to be oblivious to the departments they're overseeing. Design decisions often come with "let's just remove this feature and see if anyone was using it". Code... is just a mess. May very well be the buggiest software ever written. You will spend 90% of your time debugging and 10% redesigning something to look different to give a sense of newness. There's no structure or discernible design pattern. There are huge portions of the code base that are taboo to touch and others that are notorious for being mindbogglingly confusing. Only a very few long-time employees tend to even know what the code was meant to do in the first place. If it builds, and adheres to the guidelines (see Emphasis... below) then it's good code. Technology... has no cons. Culture... has some things that 'we don't talk about'. Everyone knows what's going on in the workplace, so no one needs talk about it. Pay is low compared to market average. There's a fairly high turnover rate due to people just being sick of the place. Some people leave with intentions of coming back to get (only way to get a raise is to get rehired). Emphasis... is given to one very specific area, unless it's not. Program-crashing bugs are top priority, unless it's not that day. Pixel-perfect UX adherence is an absolute necessity, unless we don't care at all about it. Code reviews should focus on every little whitespace change and make sure nothing is touched that doesn't need to be, unless no one cares. Overall... The company has gone slowly downhill and has lost all zeal for anything ever since the the Founder's son left as CEO a few years ago. It's tending to continue to go in that direction.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 200 Reviews

Glassdoor has 209 Xactware Solutions reviews submitted anonymously by Xactware Solutions employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Xactware Solutions is right for you.