The process starts with a 15 minute call with the recruiter that covers basic questions about your background and level of interest. It's nearly impossible to mess up this step. My recruiter was incredibly kind and courteous. The following interview is an ~1 hour video conference with a coding (SQL, Python, or R) question and analysis question focused on a proposed change to one of their products. This interview is conducted by a data scientist. Mine arrived late, wasn't very nice, and was kind of condescending. It seemed like they thought this was a waste of their time. I failed this interview step most likely because I don't have the requisite experience in defining KPIs. In all honesty, this position seems more like a "data analyst" position that they relabelled "scientist" in order to attract more applicants. In the analytics team, it seems like they are only performing descriptive and inferential statistics--not building predictive models. The next step would have been an on-site interview had I made it.