Leadership Without Backbone - Better Skip AMS Job Offers - Sourcing Coordinator AMS Employee Review

2.0
8 Apr 2022
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Acceptable basic pay but other RPOs provide bigger basic pay, like other reviews, maybe it's a good stepping stone in the RPO world BUT there is a 1yr non-compete. -They have a portal for learning materals -Decent Referral bonuses -Regular employee check ins

Cons

1. Politics -People are being promoted just because they’re close to managers, People becoming TLs but without strong foundation of people management. Being a high performer employee does not mean you can handle managing other people - they just end up as terrible leaders and even ultra micromanagers (you have to let them know when you're going to the restroom etc, will call you during breaks) 2. Laptops - laptops are old and refurbished. Makes you think if they will charge it to you when you leave when it isnt working well from the get go (had it replaced 2x) 3. All talk no walk - leaders talk about DEI & Mental health care in the workplace but they rarely show this in action. 4. Really bad HR Service - They take so long to process document requests i.e. CoE. They can give you a 1-day notice termination / non continuance of contract even after the 180 days stipulated in the PH Law wherein you should be deemed as a regualr employee after the 6th month / 180th day period. Ofcourse, no sane & young employee will file a case against this corporate giant as it will affect their next employments. 5. Clients' demands can be toxic and team managers couldnt careless. They are so robotic.

Explore other reviews about AMS

5.0
3 Dec 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

No micromanagement Great work life balance

Cons

Bonus can be hard to obtain

1.0
27 Apr 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible and remote working Great company but with the right leadership

Cons

Since the leadership change last year, the culture within AMS has deteriorated significantly. The new CDTO’s approach has created an environment that feels increasingly toxic and unsustainable for many employees. There is a strong sense that every problem is expected to be solved—or sidelined—by AI, often without realistic planning, sufficient resources, or input from the teams actually responsible for execution. This has led to confusion, constant shifting priorities, and a lack of meaningful support for getting work done effectively. At the same time, workloads have increased to an unsustainable level. Expectations continue to rise, but without additional resources or clear prioritization. Many teams are stretched thin, juggling multiple high-pressure initiatives with tight deadlines, which only adds to the stress and makes it difficult to maintain quality or balance. More concerning is the leadership style. Communication often feels driven by pressure and fear rather than clarity or collaboration. Many employees feel they are operating under constant scrutiny, which has contributed to widespread stress, anxiety, and low morale across the department. It’s becoming common to hear colleagues express reluctance to come into work, not because of the workload itself, but because of the atmosphere.

6
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All