Share purchase plan can't offset poor management and support - Senior Software Engineer CGI Employee Review

2.0
2 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Share purchase plan, EPF contribution is higher

Cons

1. No Annual Hikes from CGI 2. Bad CGI management 3. CGI Management doesn't care about employees deployed in client location (Volvo Group Connected Solution now its called Digital Technology & Operations), Managers in Volvo are very bad technically and they don't have a process which would improve the project deliverables. They just know to micromanage consultants on unwanted reasons like WFH even if the work is being delivered on time. CGI managers will not care about the consultants deployed at Volvo because they are getting their money and give consultants 50% of it . so its a win win situation for CGI and Volvo Group but the employed joined from CGI are suffering a lot mentally .

Explore other reviews about CGI

5.0
27 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great leadership Understanding of work/life balance

Cons

Don't really have any cons for this company

1.0
16 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

no specific positives to highlight from my perspective

Cons

I worked at CGI in both India and the USA and observed similar workplace culture concerns across both locations. The only real difference was HR—India HR felt more supportive, while my experience with USA HR was disappointing. My employment ended shortly after maternity leave due to an alleged “lack of projects,” which I experienced as a layoff. I also observed what appeared to be misuse of position by some leaders, including blurred professional boundaries, preferential treatment, and expectations that went beyond normal workplace roles—at times resembling personal-assistant-style demands rather than professional conduct. Surprisingly, I also noticed inconsistent “policies” applied differently to different individuals. In some cases, it felt like the rules changed depending on who you were. When leadership became aware that someone was related to another employee in the organization, it sometimes felt like that person was singled out or targeted rather than treated objectively. Overall, these practices—whether through inconsistent treatment, perceived power misuse, or favoritism—undermine trust, damage workplace culture, and raise serious concerns about fairness and professionalism.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All