Increasingly Moving Away from it Core Values, and Disconnection with Employees - Anonymous employee Criteo Employee Review

2.0
24 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good people to work - Opportunities to grow

Cons

Over the past few years, Criteo has drifted away from the core values that once defined its unique culture. While it was once seen as a "unicorn" where employees felt a genuine sense of belonging and longevity. The current environment feels increasingly individualistic and detached from its day to day employees. Criteo used the terms to describe its values as: 1. "OPEN" 2. TOGETHER" 3. IMPACTFUL" ...but in reality the lived experience is: 1. Confusing messaging from leadership. 2. Employees working within their own siloed environments (regardless if they are in an office or remote). 3. Burnout caused by growing responsibilities without a clear vision of the future. One time, when a C-Suite exec was questioned what should we do to improve employees burnout. The executive simply said that employees should just speak with their managers about their workload. As if it was that simple… but instead this exec failed to acknowledge that on reality, managers are being bombarded with competing priorities from those same executives. While on the the ground employee, questioning these demands often put you in a negative light with your manager rather than leading to actionable solution. In the current 'low hire/low fire' environment, the company has sought to push some people out through ambiguous performance feedbacks. Coincidentally happing prior to a layoff. Managers have increasingly started giving vague, out of the-blue negative feedbacks to employees, which have appeared to be an effort to create a paper trail to eventually place people on performance plans as an excuse to let them go. Consequently, creating a stressful environment and at times leaving dedicated, long term employees feeling insecure about their future, extremely confused, anxious, and undervalued. A true slap in the face from Criteo but very much in par with the stereotypical corporate culture that so many companies navigates into. The company used to invest in organization trainings, and influence people to become future leaders in the organization. But instead it’s now led by some managers who lack effective communication, people skills and very little accountability for their lack of clarity. While HR responses have become increasingly disingenuous and robotic. Even the responses seen here, on glassdoor, sounds AI generated. Ultimately, there is a profound disconnect between the current leadership’s direction and the foundational culture established by founder Jean-Baptiste Rudelle and the previous CEO.

avatar
Criteo Response
2mo
Transparent feedback can always be turned into actionable insights so we always welcome it, whether it is positive or negative. As a company, we share the ambition to build sustainable growth for Criteo as a business and as a community. The decisions we make are therefore taken with shared responsibility, maximum transparency, and long-term organizational health in mind. We keep fostering a global culture where trust and accountability are core expectations for everyone—leaders and individual contributors alike. The workplace we want to build is one where everyone feels safe and confident to speak their mind. Every voice matters and deserves to be heard, so thank you for sharing yours. We take your insights into account and thank you for your contribution to Criteo.

Explore other reviews about Criteo

5.0
8 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great environment, great people to work with

Cons

Need to go back to office

avatar
Criteo Response
3d
We're thrilled to receive such positive feedback and to know that you've found a place where you can grow and thrive at Criteo. Thank you for sharing and for your trust all these years. It's great to have you on the team!
2.0
31 Jan 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Smart, hardworking people at the individual contributor level (many of whom are now gone). Little micro-managing, but that’s because everyone’s bandwidth is near 0

Cons

Post–new CEO, the company has descended into complete chaos. There is no transparency around decisions that impact teams and roles. There have been consistent strategy, personnel, and supplier changes with no explanation, accountability, or follow-through. Cons, continued: Employee input and performance do not matter. Decisions feel driven by appeasing BoD and optics rather than results, input and reality. The culture has become a corporate hellscape of: Endless reorganizations with no clear rationale, including layoffs with no reasoning Vague all-hands meetings that avoid real issues, even when directly asked A massive disconnect between the C-suite and day-to-day reality Eroded trust and growing position insecurity Middle managers incentivized to prioritize managing up & executive optics over team advocacy “Return to Office” policy put in place when promised a “Work from Anywhere” position, where the RTO policy differs across employees’ location Little to no growth opportunities despite high performance Under-market average compensation that was justified by locale, “Work from Anywhere”, and flexibility — which was recently rolled back A clear favoritism to those that “talk the talk” vs “performance with numbers”

10
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All