As close to a roller coaster ride as you can get. Buckle up. - Anonymous employee Leidos Employee Review

2.0
6 Nov 2013
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The best thing for me about Leidos Health are the people. Whether it's the sales team, recruiters, managers, or fellow consultants I interact with, everyone is so helpful. The managerial staff does check in often to see how things at your client site are going. I do feel like the company wants you to succeed and tries to provide the tools for that to happen.

Cons

Let's start with a history lesson... Before SAIC spun off into two companies to form Leidos Health, they acquired Vitalize Consulting and then maxIT Healthcare. Both were fairly small companies that offered great benefits. Huge bonuses, not much competition for roles, yearly trips, incremental anniversary rewards, stable bench policy, etc. All of that went to the wayside after coming under the SAIC roof. We've also lost A LOT of great executives due to ego (hint: the ones with the ego aren't the ones that left). It's still a decent company with your typical benefits. There's just nothing that makes it stand out from the other 100+ consulting firms out there. The luster they once had is now gone.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
15 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great culture, supportive management, encouragement for self development

Cons

Some decisions move too slowly.

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All