Hunting License - Scientist Leidos Employee Review

4.0
10 Mar 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

While Leidos is a big company it feels like a small company. Local units have a lot of autonomy (although this is changing). When work needs to be done, no one cares about job titles or seniority. This means plenty of opportunities to interact with higher-level management inside the company and with customers. If you find an opportunity and sell management on it then you own it, both in capture and execution.

Cons

P&L centers are close to the little guy, so being in a healthy unit is much more important than the company's overall performance. Margins are thin so if you have no billable hours you have no job. You have to kill to eat, so either bring that entrepreneurism or stick yourself to someone who is trying to build something.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All