You're Just a Pawn on the Production Line - GIS Analyst Leidos Employee Review

2.0
14 Mar 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

-Friendly coworkers -Flexible on hours if you hit core hours (10-3:30) -Not a cube farm, yet. -Free coffee -DC United Tickets for cheap (lol)

Cons

-Low pay (below industry standard) -Terrible health care and benefits -Constantly cutting benefits -Not very interested in investing in your future -Upward mobility is based on time there and not actual skill -Promises are not kept. I was promised to do one type of work, but then passively forced into something else that did not help my career path. Other people were promised the chance to get a clearance and never got put forth for one. -Forced to use your PTO if there is a snow day and you can't make the hours up in time period. -My PM would literally walk by in the office without acknowledging your existence. -If you are not willing to work EWW, you end up on the bad side of management. -Very little is done to promote social interaction in the workplace. -They are currently trying to cut costs on everything because they aren't doing so well since the split from SAIC.

Explore other reviews about Leidos

5.0
7 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Large companies. Willingness to work with you.

Cons

Low paying. No hybrid opportunity

3.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Leidos provides opportunities to work on complex government programs with meaningful technical challenges. Depending on the contract and team, there can be exposure to cloud infrastructure, cybersecurity, systems engineering, networking, and mission-focused work that is difficult to find elsewhere. The company also has a large footprint, so there may be internal opportunities for people who are able to navigate the organization.

Cons

My experience was that the quality of management varied significantly by program. Communication around expectations, roles, and priorities was often inconsistent, and decisions that affected employees were not always explained clearly or handled in a transparent way. Work-life balance also depended heavily on local management. Flexibility that existed in practice could be changed quickly, and employees were sometimes left trying to reconcile changing expectations with existing workloads and personal obligations. In my view, the company would benefit from stronger oversight of program-level management decisions, especially where employee responsibilities, workplace flexibility, and performance feedback are concerned. I also found that technical decision-making was sometimes driven more by schedule pressure than by sound engineering judgment. On complex government programs, that can create unnecessary risk and frustration for employees who are trying to do things correctly.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All