Forces managers to "fit a square peg in a round hole" daily.... - Maintenance Supervisor OTIS Employee Review

3.0
3 Aug 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety minded company, great margin for contracts, good job security. Plenty of time outside the office.

Cons

Union Labor goes against the grain at times, makes twice the pay as management and can be difficult to lead. Zero quality in this business, all quantity. Constantly chasing your tail, no pro-activeness in maintenance and repair, very reactive. Some customers can be very difficult because of this. Company relies on lower level management to carry the entire weight of sometimes unmanageable contracts.

Explore other reviews about OTIS

5.0
12 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Real team work oriented. Feels very much being part of the company

Cons

Needs juggling multiple jobs! A lot of travel involved. But great learning opportunities follow these.

1.0
6 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Otis is a well-known company with a strong brand name, established customers, and exposure to major commercial accounts. The role gives you real responsibility quickly, especially if you are managing a service territory with active customer issues, contract renewals, and operational escalations. The experience can build strong skills in account management, customer retention, field coordination, problem solving, and handling high-pressure customer situations. You get direct exposure to customers, technicians, operations, and leadership, which can be valuable if you want to grow in service, sales, or facilities-related industries

Cons

The biggest issue is poor management. The branch has serious operational problems, but leadership does not seem to have a clear plan to fix them. Instead, the pressure gets pushed down to the account manager, who ends up dealing with angry customers, unresolved service issues, delayed communication, and internal problems they do not fully control. Management needs to take more ownership of the environment they are putting employees into. New hires should not be expected to clean up long-standing territory issues without proper training, realistic timelines, and real support. There is a big difference between holding people accountable and blaming them for problems that were already there. The leadership style feels reactive instead of organized. Problems are addressed after they become urgent, communication is inconsistent, and expectations can feel disconnected from what is actually happening in the field. This creates unnecessary pressure on employees and makes it harder to rebuild trust with customers. The role would be much more manageable if management provided stronger onboarding, clearer priorities, better internal coordination, and more realistic expectations. Without that, employees can end up stuck between frustrated customers and a leadership team that does not provide enough support to actually solve the root issues.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All