Wouldn't even wish my enemies to work here. - Anonymous employee Tenant Inc. Employee Review

1.0
8 Mar 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1salary gets credited on time 2.Colleagues were friendly. 🙂

Cons

1.Senior leadership lacks both technical and soft skills 2.Office politics are a major concern, where HR and management often show favoritism based on region and gender—with Andhra employees sometimes preferred, North Indian employees often ignored, and even things like ratings, leave approvals, and work-from-home flexibility given to a few favored employees, while others are forced to apply for leave regardless of how difficult their situation is. 3.Seniors often avoid responsibility and lack even basic knowledge, yet act with arrogance as if they are working at NASA, spending much of the day gossiping while dumping all the work on others and expecting them to work 12 hours a day, including weekends. 4.They can fire you anytime regardless of your performance while their fav employees will get good hikes even if they dont do anything. 5.Clueless, incompetent and spineless middle management who will mess things up royally and push the blame on others when things go south. They treat employees with absolutely zero regards and you're expected to slave for them round the clock. 6.Many other issues are present—just read the reviews; whatever negative is written about the management and leadership, I believe much of it is true. If I had to write about everything I faced, it would take more than a decade.

Explore other reviews about Tenant Inc.

5.0
30 Sept 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great ppl, passionate of tech

Cons

Can be stressful and challenging

1.0
25 Aug 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Talented peers in Tech Support. There are quality employees across the customer-facing teams, just severely lacking the backing to succeed.

Cons

Decision-making prioritized preference over evidence, and the people closest to customers were routinely sidelined. Cross-team communication broke down, and leadership often defaulted to interdepartmental blame instead of owning outcomes. Leadership and decision-making Senior leadership operated in silos. Feedback from frontline teams was dismissed or reframed as a “lack of effort,” masking real staffing and prioritization gaps. Strategy was presented as certainty even when data and on-the-ground signals said otherwise. Execution and product quality Releases repeatedly went out with systemic QA gaps that produced major regressions. These were predictable results of weak release gates, unclear ownership, and shipping to a calendar rather than to readiness. When failures reached production, Tech Support absorbed the fallout while still managing a heavy backlog of unresolved defects. Support and escalation Ticket escalations frequently aged without meaningful updates within the technology organization. Operations did not consistently back Tech Support when cross-team help was required, leaving support accountable for issues it had no authority to prevent. Culture and accountability Stated values around collaboration and customer focus were largely aspirational. Raising risks early was treated as negativity. The environment rewarded keeping heads down over surfacing problems, so the same fires returned sprint after sprint. Impact Customers experienced avoidable breakage, morale declined, and turnover increased. Those doing the heaviest lifting had the least influence on the inputs that drive outcomes.

7
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All