A good company that thinks it's a great company - Software Engineer Veoneer Employee Review

3.0
23 Nov 2018
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Reasonable flexibility in dress code, working hours. HC benefits are reasonably priced.

Cons

What it really comes down to is which group you get into. Some groups have people been there a long time, love the group and job. Other groups are revolving doors. I was in one of the revolving doors. Possibly the most pitiful tools I've ever worked with for embedded programming. And that's being generous. The office working conditions could only be described as "atrocious." Noisy, high traffic, constant interruptions, it goes on....all of which are supposed to be addressed by the "new building." That will, I concede, correct many physical problems but many are just not that at all.

Explore other reviews about Veoneer

5.0
6 Oct 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong exposure , Free hand to take a project decision, Good team to work with.

Cons

Medium base salary, Good benefits

2.0
28 Jan 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Veoneer (originally Autoliv) was once a great place to work. In the early years, the culture was strong, collaboration was valued, and employees felt invested in. The work itself was meaningful, and there was pride in being part of a company focused on safety and innovation. Many of the direct coworkers were knowledgeable, dedicated, and supportive, which made day-to-day work rewarding.

Cons

After multiple spin-offs and corporate restructuring, the company culture steadily declined. Employees increasingly felt like trading commodities rather than valued contributors. Direction and focus shifted often, communication from upper management became limited, and transparency was lacking. Despite long tenure and experience the decisions around severance felt impersonal and disconnected from actual contributions or institutional knowledge. Support from upper management during transitions was minimal.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All