employer cover photo
employer logo
employer logo

Working America

Is this your company?

Working America Reviews

3.1

41% would recommend to a friend

(181 total reviews)
avatar

Karen Nussbaum

40% approve of CEO

32% positive business outlook

Working America has an employee rating of 3.1 out of 5 stars, based on 181 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The Working America employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

181 reviews
2.0
3 Mar 2014
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Karen Nussbaum, the Executive Director of working America AFL-CIO is a visionary and inspiring leader committed to improving the lives of workers. Better pay compared to other canvasses. Management positions salaries are competitive and Career positions in DC pay well. Progressive discipline and just cause exists to protect unionized canvassers.

Cons

National FIELD management. As a community affiliate of the AFL-CIO, they unfortunately do not walk the talk if they don't have too. Unlike entry level canvassers, management and career positions do not have union representation and are classified as "at will" where you can be terminated without just cause or fair process at the drop of hat. Upper field management in DC tends to exercise decision making power in a way that is inconsistent and subjective. They will train their managers to "seek first to understand" but not follow their own advice when dealing with non-union employees. Promotions tend to be based on personality vs performance. Sometimes they interview for promotions and other times they simply handpick their choice; no consistent process-bordering on nepotism. These double standards undermine their mission and hurt dedicated hardworking employees.

2.0
27 Jun 2016
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I started as a canvasser with Working America and eventually became a Field Director. I worked 4 election cycles. We also tested several models for fundraising. Due to the nature of the work, anyone can learn the basics of the door-to-door canvass, in a non-fundraising model. If a canvasser is identified as having potential to move into a field managing (or higher), training and opportunities to develop come readily. As a part of the labor movement, issue based advocacy is focused around workers issues and persuasion around local, and occasionally national elections. If you are looking to get a jump start in working on issued advocacy, and are planning to stay less than 3 years, it is an excellent place to learn an organizing skill set.

Cons

The nature of fundraising is at odds with political work. Additionally, door-to-door fundraising is not sustainable long term. Fundraising goals are based on national direction and have very little connection to realities of local communities - particularly given the need to organize in blue-collar and low income communities. Field Directors have little autonomy around hiring and firing - you are directed to hire almost everyone and if someone misses quota three weeks out of five, they have "cycled out - this model is intentional. Field Directors also have little say regarding campaigns being worked on. When Field Directors are recruited, they are often told that this is a way to begin to work on the "program" side - which is disingenuous at best. Additionally, all staff are encouraged to be "geo-flexible" - meaning you are expected to relocate - which is not always disclosed. This creates an environment where staff have little outside life that does not include canvass staff. Despite being told the position is about 45 hours a week, the realities of managing a constant cycling of staff means regularly working 60 or more hours per week. I was often discouraged from using my sick-time or vacation time.During my time, Field Directors were expected to re-apply for their position after every election. Finally, despite being a part of the labor movement, Field Directors do not have the benefit of being a part of a collective bargaining unit.

1.0
8 Apr 2013

Make no mistake: You are a temp.

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The hours are good, if you're not a morning person -- 1 to 9 P.M. Wage is better than most jobs that will hire anyone.

Cons

Working America lures you in with promises of a good, stable, union job, with great benefits. Once you get there, you quickly discover that almost nobody has been with the organization for long enough to actually get benefits. This is because they have the job rigged, so that everyone except management will quickly be fired for not reaching quotas. Employee voices are not considered, and the union contract affords you no actual protection. These are not simply the words of a disgruntled employee who could not handle the job -- it is literally true that NO ONE was able to stay with the organization, except for management. Honest managers even admit that this is indeed how their system works.

Viewing 1 - 3 of 181 Reviews

Glassdoor has 204 Working America reviews submitted anonymously by Working America employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if Working America is right for you.