AnswerLab Reviews

3.6

44% would recommend to a friend

(89 total reviews)
avatar

Megan Malli

Not enough data to show CEO approval

22% positive business outlook

AnswerLab has an employee rating of 3.6 out of 5 stars, based on 89 company reviews on Glassdoor which indicates that most employees have a good working experience there. The AnswerLab employee rating is in line with the average (within 1 standard deviation) for employers within the Management and consulting industry (3.7 stars).

Reviews by job title

89 reviews
5.0
28 May 2020

Great company to work with

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The team and the management connect well with the employees. The resources for self improvement in terms of documents and colleagues' times have been immensely helpful.

Cons

No negative experience from my side

4.0
30 Aug 2022

Research

Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Work culture, team work, interesting projects, coworkers

Cons

I don’t have any specific things to mention for this one

2.0
12 Jun 2021

All talk no action

Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Answerlab boasts many extremely bright and dedicated employees.

Cons

Those same employees are squeezed for all they are worth. With the exception of the sales and executive team who make bank off of other people’s blood sweat and tears, everyone is overworked and consequently underpaid. The notion of a ‘unique culture’ is pushed all too often but aside from getting overpriced blankets to push political views on employees and empty talks about diversity, the culture is very much like being back in high school. Mediocre middle management runs the show with little skill, experience or clear vision. Promotions are given only to those this clique bestows such honors to, often leaving you scratching your head why as they are not typically awarded to those with a demonstrated performance history to warrant said promotions. More troubling is that those who are truly deserving are often times skipped over altogether. A new policy of no longer announcing employee departures is a concerted effort to mask retention loss at a visible scale. Expect a glaring turnover and loss of industry leaders with this questionable/arbitrary mode of selective advancement. There is a huge issue with the existing hiring process. Middle management continually extends job offers to those who are somehow previously associated with them in one form or another. Countless, genuinely worthy candidates who take the time and effort to submit resumes are either overlooked entirely or played around with if they are selected to partake in initial interviews. When employees refer eligible hires who are then ghosted or mistreated during the interview phase, you end up alienating suitable candidates and anyone who may have considered referring talent in the future. Expect to work absurd hours and not be compensated for it as your employment status of exempt is a devious loop hole to habitually have you working considerably more hours for the same 40 hour a week pay. Even though this is a service industry which necessitates some overtime work put in on occasion, 70 hour work weeks are the norm here which is NOT NORMAL by any stretch of the imagination. For researchers, a quick review of ScheduleIt will regularly reveal employees working at 500%, 800% or 1000% capacity! This will most certainly interfere with one’s work-life balance and additionally, will ultimately have a hugely deleterious impact on one’s physical health and overall wellbeing. If you do have the courage to raise the issue with a superior, be forewarned that it will be used against you moving forward. Buzzwords like GRATITUDE at all staff meetings sound nice but the implementation of this ideal is sorely lacking. As for ‘caretime,’ while likely well-intentioned in theory is most obviously a farce. Any attempt to genuinely be a part of driving solutions will be dismissed completely. It seems as though company wide process improvement is of zero importance if not initiated by middle or upper management themselves. Again, another head scratcher as such desires are only intended to positively serve the company in tackling areas where pain points have long existed. These are not arbitrary improvements but those which are critical to the long term success of the organization. Non-managers are the ones most closely affected by these procedural flaws so extending that opportunity for everyone to have a voice and enact change is not only the logical thing to do but it should be welcomed whole-heartedly.

avatar
AnswerLab Response
4y
Thank you for your review. Several of us worked together to reflect on it, and we felt a lot of sadness, it really sunk in for us that you’ve had a very unhappy experience. Your review prompted a process of going inward to consider how we could ensure nobody has such an experience again, and we’re grateful for that. Although you mention several areas, it sounds like the core of your frustration which many of these issues stem from relates to your experience of AnswerLab’s managers. One thing we wanted to point out is how much we’ve invested in manager development over the past year. We have implemented monthly management training programs, created a talent development framework for people managers, and invested in external training programs. All this is to help new managers of our growing company transition from being brilliant individual contributors as UX researchers, to help them fulfill their career growth aspirations as people managers. It can take time for these programs to shift culture but we are seeing and celebrating all the ways it’s already happening. We want to extend empathy and genuine regret for your experience, and also offer a balancing perspective. Some of your assessments are a bit categorical and don’t reflect the lived experience for most people at AnswerLab. Here are a few that we feel called to provide a clarifying response to: ScheduleIt percentages don’t reflect actual hours worked, and nobody works at the high percentages which sometimes appear on the tool. That’s because ScheduleIt is designed for hour-based scheduling but our team uses it instead to allocate full days, (which get recorded as 24 hours). We’ve provided instructions for researchers to turn off this feature because we don’t use it. Eventually we may switch to a resourcing tool that better reflects the way we want to use it. Many AnswerLabbers from all levels have shared their needs and feedback with leadership using the many pathways we provide. Many of us have contributed ideas for change, and the resulting conversations have started several new initiatives and changed procedures. For instance, many researchers and managers advocated for more flexibility and researcher involvement in scheduling research sessions, which we are very proud that we have now implemented. Also, many people felt it was important to honor AnswerLabbers’ transitions to new opportunities, and AnswerLab returned to acknowledging these via all company email. These are just a few examples. Our capacity model, which is our instrument that ensure we have enough researchers to staff incoming work, is something we are reviewing constantly. It’s complex during this time of incredibly fast growth, to get it right. Although we don’t always get it right, we are certainly focused on ensuring 40 hour work weeks are the norm. Inclusivity of all kinds (race, age, family status, sexual orientation, gender identity) is part of our company’s DNA and we believe especially today it’s important to take a public stand in support of a more just and equitable world. The past 18 months have been difficult for many of us, including everyone working hard to ensure AnswerLab remained a stable business supporting employees and their families. We are proud we were able to retain everyone, increase salaries and build unique pandemic benefits. We believe that our devotion to AnswerLabbers is what has contributed to our 93% retention rate even during this time of transition. We extend you and your loved ones well wishes.
Viewing 1 - 3 of 89 Reviews

Glassdoor has 93 AnswerLab reviews submitted anonymously by AnswerLab employees. Read employee reviews and ratings on Glassdoor to decide if AnswerLab is right for you.