Summer Intern - Good Experience - Summer Intern Dow Employee Review

4.0
27 Oct 2008
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

I worked as a summer intern for Dow Chemical and it was a very good experience. My major is chemical engineering and they placed me with an improvement engineering group in Midland Michigan. The supervisors definately take the time to develop you professionally and provide projects with meaningful assignments, reasonable obstacles, and achieveable goals. The people here are very friendly (from the management down to the operators) and you will definately be able to contribute.

Cons

It's in Michigan or Texas (rarely California for interns) Much of the plant is old, with little opportunity to make big technological improvements. Good for people looking to settle down or start a long career in one firm, but not great for young people looking to take large amounts of responsiblities.

Explore other reviews about Dow

5.0
16 Apr 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Culture and the technical expertise within the company provide for a working environment where you don't work in silo and everyone is willing to help support you

Cons

Administrative systems can be burdensome to overcome.

2.0
22 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Safety culture, flexibility (although less and less over time). Good health insurance and 401k match

Cons

Dow’s recent years illustrate the challenges of trying to simultaneously satisfy Wall Street’s demands for strong financial performance and aggressive DEI (Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion) priorities. The company has heavily emphasized inclusion initiatives, including its openly gay CEO publicly sharing that coming out was one of the best days of his life in an internal communication, along with a notable increase in women appointed to senior leadership roles. Hiring practices reportedly require diverse candidate slates—including female candidates—and diverse interview panels before filling positions. These efforts, while well-intentioned, appear to have contributed to a series of questionable strategic decisions. Employees have borne the brunt through repeated rounds of layoffs (including significant cuts announced in recent years), minimal merit increases often in the 2-3% range, stalled promotions, and little turnover at the top levels of leadership. Senior executives seem insulated from the consequences, potentially overlooking how these factors—including their own leadership—may be central to the company’s ongoing struggles.

2
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All