Too good to be true. - Technology Lead - USA Infosys Employee Review

1.0
12 Mar 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

made an offer, even up'ed the offer 2 times to get me to leave my previous job.

Cons

Onboarding was a joke. Reimbursements for traveling to onboarding was restricted with max amounts. And as has been stated in other reviews which I should have taken heart to. Work life balance means nothing to them. It's more important to use the "make you move" excuse to try and staff you at other locations in the country, most of which I didn't want to live in. Maybe starting out in a career it would be ok if you like the idea of moving about. Otherwise, if you have set up roots, this is probably not the place for you. Staffing managers think you must have 100% match before they try to put you on a project. You have no means to self directy yourself into projects at all.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
27 Feb 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Management Resources Work life Balance

Cons

Pay and benefits could be better

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All