Infosys - rechristened PAINfosys - Analyst Infosys Employee Review

1.0
14 Oct 2010
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

- Good performance results in higher responsibilities giving good exposure. - An Inside view of the disconnect between the founder's vision and the present day implementation : a good lesson for wannabe entrepreneurs. - Great place for lazy bums. - Ability to juggle work and sycophancy will see you go place - if you think you have it in you, go for it. - No expectations of great performance; you'll have it easy. Putting in the hours is all it takes; what you do in all that while is irrelevant.

Cons

- Normalization : Anyone and everyone stays at the same level, despite the performance or the contribution. - Salaries are revised in accordance with the standards for Freshers. - Pathetic leadership - Long hours are expected - the managers do not have an eye to recognize quality. Do not expect any wonders at Infosys. - Not a place for growth oriented people.

Explore other reviews about Infosys

5.0
27 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Working for the manufacturing client

Cons

Currently didn't observed any Cons.

4.0
10 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Job stability – Infosys is known for long-term employment and steady projects. Strong brand value – Having Infosys on your resume adds credibility and global recognition. Good learning opportunities – Access to internal learning platforms, certifications, and training programs (especially for freshers). Global exposure – Opportunities to work with international clients and global delivery teams. Structured processes – Well-defined policies, documentation, and governance. Work-life balance (project dependent) – Many teams offer reasonable working hours. Employee benefits – Health insurance, paid leaves, and wellness initiatives. Safe and inclusive workplace – Strong focus on ethics, compliance, and diversity.

Cons

Salary growth can be slow – Compensation increments may be lower compared to market standards. Limited flexibility in role changes – Internal mobility and project switches can take time. Bureaucratic processes – Decision-making can be slow due to multiple approval layers. Project allocation delays – Bench time and delayed onboarding to projects can happen. Variable learning exposure – Skill growth depends heavily on the project assigned. Less innovation in some teams – Certain projects may use legacy technologies. Onsite opportunities are limited – Compared to earlier years, onsite roles are fewer. Performance appraisal transparency – Rating systems may feel rigid or unclear.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All