Good company to work outside Technology organization - Vice President - Technology Mastercard Employee Review

3.0
6 Feb 2019
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Good CEO vision, corporate strategy, and business model. Mastercard has a competitive product strategy to win the market share globally. They offer very nice benefits. CEO has outlined good cultural values on paper and genuinely expects everyone to live by them. In summary, a good place to work outside Technology department.

Cons

Technology organization is all about EVPs driving their own agenda and promoting people based on affinity and punishing those that challenge them with decency. Her way/his way mentality results in picking people and strategies to just exercise power. Some Executives are living in their comfort zone for a long time creating risks to the core areas of the company with poor technical oversight. New leaders are busy copying other tech companies creating more silos. It's not uncommon where Executives use performance management as a tool for employee retaliation. President has a good vision but mostly surrounded by poor leadership team resulting in slow technology advancements.

Explore other reviews about Mastercard

5.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Technically strong and work culture is good

Cons

interview process is long , no issues

4.0
27 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Mastercard does a great job fostering an inclusive and supportive environment. There are genuinely good people throughout the organization, and leadership often invests in employee engagement through events, recognition, and culture-building initiatives. I enjoyed many of the relationships I built while working there, and there are teams that truly care about collaboration and supporting one another.

Cons

Compensation at the director level did not feel competitive compared to the level of responsibility expected. Career advancement can also be extremely challenging due to how top-heavy the organization is with senior leadership roles. There are a large number of Senior Vice Presidents, sometimes without clear scope or experience aligned to the title, which creates limited room for high-performing employees to grow. At times, it felt like senior leaders were being hired primarily to manage or communicate with other senior leaders, rather than drive meaningful operational impact. In product and go-to-market roles especially, priorities are often heavily driven by funding decisions. It can be frustrating when projects suddenly shift in importance or remain underfunded for long periods of time while awaiting senior leadership review. This sometimes leaves highly talented employees in limbo, unable to move initiatives forward despite strong momentum or market opportunity. The organization can also be very comfortable with the status quo, which creates a slower pace that many employees seem accustomed to. For people who are highly motivated and eager to drive change, it can feel difficult to navigate the number of roadblocks and layers of approval required to move initiatives forward.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All