Former Intervet Employee (Lab Tech 2 in production facility) - Lab Tech II Merck Employee Review

3.0
15 Apr 2009
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Benefits were excellent, 8 - 9% company match for 401k TON of paid time off, however there is no distinction between sick time and vacation time, 18 days during year 1, 23 days year 2, 28 days year 5, 33 days year 10, and 38 days year 20. There is room for growth if you stay long enough. Corporate jobs are rarely vacated, leading me to believe that they are pretty good jobs They hold some fun functions throughout the year, summer party, Thanksgiving lunch The business is closed for a week during Christmas and a week during Summer, although you have to use vacation time for this.

Cons

The work was very menial, physical. A lot of scrubbing walls, ceilings, floors, then going back and sanitizing walls, ceilings, floors. Dealing with high temps, high humidity environment at times Changing clothes several times per day, working in bunnysuits (coveralls with hood and boots, face mask, two pair of gloves, safety glasses, basically no part of body uncovered) Not a lot of use of my BS in biology, mostly physical labor. High turnover rate in production area (where I worked) After rumors about the Intervet being bought out, the company insisted that they were not for sale, then were bought several months later. Minimum of 3-5 years before potential for promotion or major pay increase Pay was slightly lower than other similar jobs in the area

Explore other reviews about Merck

5.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Amazing to work and smart people to work around.

Cons

Not sponsoring in the US

4.0
2 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Over my tenure, I had the opportunity to work alongside highly talented and mission-driven colleagues dedicated to improving patient outcomes. The organization provided exposure to cross-functional collaboration, leadership development opportunities, and meaningful work supporting healthcare providers, patients, and community stakeholders. I appreciated the company's commitment to innovation, professional growth, and serving patients through scientific advancement.

Cons

Like many large organizations, priorities and organizational structures evolved over time, which occasionally created uncertainty and changes in responsibilities. Decision-making processes could sometimes be complex due to the size of the organization, and navigating multiple layers of stakeholders occasionally impacted speed and execution.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All