I don’t recommend working here - Space Systems Engineering Northrop Grumman Employee Review

2.0
11 Mar 2025
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1. It’s not too hard to internally apply to other positions to get better pay and hopefully better work. 2. Easy to coast

Cons

1. You have to stay 3 years to get your stocks vested. All or nothing which is really dumb. 2. Raises are awful. 2.5% was the standard this year, while 3% or higher is considered “good” 3. They reward new hires, not current employees. They give high raises, sign on bonus, and/or promos to poach new talent. However, they treat current employees poorly. 4. When you meet the number of years of experience to move up to the next level, you have to “prove” you are worth the promo. Really dumb considering point #3. My manager told me to get a competing offer to help make a case for a promo. 5. Tons of nepotism and non-technical managers. They laid off workers who actually did work and came in person in 2024 but kept managers who don’t actually work (I.e. scrum masters) 6. Too top heavy… more managers, directors and VPs compared to other contractors in my experience. managers who don’t manage… but with the manager pay band. I’ve never seen that until I started working here. 7. Annual raises are typically 900 to 1.5k usd unless you are nominated for a better one. In general, it is very rare for non management to get a better bonus

Explore other reviews about Northrop Grumman

5.0
29 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible work arrangement, 9/80 schedule, job security

Cons

Low pay, full time on site required for career growth

1.0
11 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Not much pros but talented coworkers.

Cons

I joined expecting a long-term career and initially had a positive experience. Unfortunately, the culture changed significantly after leadership transitions. Micromanagement increased, decision-making became highly centralized, and employee morale steadily declined. Many experienced employees and managers left during my time there, making it difficult to maintain continuity and trust within the organization. The work itself was meaningful, and I had the opportunity to support important projects with talented colleagues. However, recognition, career growth, and employee retention did not appear to receive the same level of attention as process, reporting, and management oversight. My layoff was communicated as unrelated to performance, which was appreciated. However, after years of contribution and institutional knowledge, the overall experience left me feeling that employees were viewed as replaceable rather than valued long-term assets.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All