Pros
The atmosphere was filled with friendly, supportive, and talented individuals who made each day enjoyable. The "team life" was awesome!
Cons
One of the major drawbacks was the company's approach to politics. The CEO/CTO often emphasized and promoted what could be described as "woke" agendas in company-wide meetings. Guest included activist after activist. These meetings, which invited all 13,000+ employees, sometimes felt like platforms for promoting specific political viewpoints rather than focusing on the company's mission and goals. This heavy emphasis on politics within the workplace created an environment that was distracting and sometimes uncomfortable. Additionally, there were concerns about the company's approach to diversity and inclusion. It was openly stated in all-hands meetings that a specific percentage of managerial roles would be reserved for women of color. While diversity and inclusion are important, it felt as though these objectives were prioritized over talent and skills. This approach raised concerns about whether promotions and advancement were based on merit. Furthermore, there was a sense among employees that they were treated more like numbers than individuals. The company's growth strategy heavily relied on acquiring other companies, which often led to a loss of the small, close-knit feeling that many employees initially enjoyed. The sense of being part of something smaller and more personal was gradually eroded as the company expanded through acquisitions. Lastly, there was a noticeable disparity between the company's financial success, as often touted in all-hands meetings, and the actual compensation and advancement opportunities for employees. Pay scales were notably low, and promises of promotions and advancement were frequently unfulfilled due to claims of budget constraints, despite the company's consistent claims of achieving record-breaking quarter.