Review of life in a HeadQuarters office - Anonymous employee PepsiCo Employee Review

3.0
12 Mar 2010
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

The company is dynamic, changing and growing. It is also a solid place to work as the product portfolio will ensure that consumers continue to want and buy, hence ensuring good job stability. Work life balance is important, as is the people side of the company - much time is invested in this.

Cons

Opportunities are there, but you generally have to be extremely high performing to really move roles rapidly. In my experience, the majority of people have been in the same role for a while. You have to also be willing to relocate and move to wherever new roles are coming up. In some of the roles, you are not exposed so much to the wider initiatives of the company, you have to be willing to go outside your actual department to find some of the better things going on.

Explore other reviews about PepsiCo

5.0
15 Jun 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Pay, schedule, team, job, and benefits

Cons

Workload, hours, store managers, turnover, and drive time

4.0
6 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Worked for PepsiCo for 10 years across four locations in Pennsylvania, Delaware, and Florida. Gained experience in multiple sales and operational roles while supporting account growth, merchandising, and customer relationships. Florida locations were especially well-operated and efficient. PepsiCo provided competitive pay, solid benefits through Keystone, and a good vacation package compared to competitors in the beverage industry. The company also offered strong sales incentive programs, earning rewards such as Orlando Magic floor seats, Pro Bowl tickets, Apple Watches, and Yeti cups for exceeding performance goals and driving sales results.

Cons

While PepsiCo promotes internal growth opportunities, many promotions and leadership opportunities appeared to favor college internship hires over long-term internal employees. In some cases, newer college-based management pushed corporate initiatives without fully understanding local market realities or account volume trends. For example, innovation products were sometimes forced into low-volume accounts where sell-through was unrealistic. Operationally, certain delivery processes could be improved, particularly with Tropicana products being stored in coolers on trucks for extended periods, which could impact product quality and increase waste. Work-life balance could also be challenging, as sales representatives commonly worked 50–60 hour weeks. Expectations from corporate leadership were often unrealistic, especially when customer representatives and drivers were expected to fully stock stores while servicing 15+ accounts per day. Experiences could also vary depending on whether locations were union or non-union operated.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All