SDE-intern applicants have rated the interview process at Expedia Group with 2.7 out of 5 (where 5 is the highest level of difficulty) and assessed their interview experience as 82% positive. To compare, the company-average is 61.4% positive. This is according to Glassdoor user ratings.
Candidates applying for SDE-intern roles take an average of 3 days to get hired, when considering 11 user submitted interviews for this role. To compare, the hiring process at Expedia Group overall takes an average of 17 days.
Common stages of the interview process at Expedia Group as a SDE-intern according to 11 Glassdoor interviews include:
One on one interview: 30%
Skills test: 15%
Personality test: 10%
Presentation: 10%
Phone interview: 10%
Background check: 5%
Drug test: 5%
Group panel interview: 5%
Other: 5%
IQ intelligence test: 5%
Here are the most commonly searched roles for interview reports -
Three interviews. Two technical and one behavior. It was nearly the end of their hiring season, and I had three happening in one afternoon and that was sort of intense.
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
First one writing some simple methods just like all other interviews. The second one tested out data structure in a way that “how would you design a product”. The third one basically describing past engineering experiences.
2 dsa and behavioral interviews, was asked leetcode mediums, also was grilled a bit on resume projects, furthermore they focused on problem solving approach and also how one would behave given a situation
Interview questions [1]
Question 1
Binary Search in 2D array II
Number of Paths
Level Order Binary Tree Traversal
There was a personality assessment and an online assessment with multiple choice and one coding problem followed by 2 technical interviews back to back. Each interview was an hour long.
I applied through university. The process took 1 day. I interviewed at Expedia Group (Jaipur, Rajasthan) in Sept 2025
Interview
This was an on-campus drive with two interview rounds conducted independently. In my interview, I was asked two easy-to-medium DSA questions, followed by detailed discussions on the projects mentioned in my resume. The interview went very smoothly, and the interviewer seemed quite satisfied with my approach and explanations.
However, in the second round, the interviewer introduced a DSA problem but revealed the constraints gradually instead of explaining the complete problem upfront. As I proposed solutions, additional conditions were added, which made the problem increasingly complex and led to some confusion. Unfortunately, this affected my performance, and I was ultimately not selected.