Snail paced recruitment process. Took them three weeks to screen analytical, logical and coding ability and get to first technical discussion. I had two other offers rolled out during this time but because the coding challenge was better here, I gave the interview. The interview experience was totally unpleasant. Interviewer started speaking in Hindi (I understand and speak Hindi well but assuming the candidate to be comfortable in languages other than English is unprofessional) and kept on giving life lectures on how I should have chosen differently in my previous experience. He kept on going with irrelevant questions even after I had given him justifications to my decisions. It is important to understand that there could be several unknown parameters in someone's life which you are unaware of which could be driving a decision. It's laughable that the interviewer thinks that I haven't made the best decisions in my life previously. (It's my life. I know what's the best possibility.) When the actual technical discussion began, first few questions made it clear that the interviewer was more focused on asking ancient corner questions which don't have much significance in today's development scenario. It was evident that the interviewer wanted to project that he is a superior individual to candidates. It's important to understand that an interview is an event to know how much a candidate understands rather than a display of what the interviewer knows. Afterwards, I kept losing interest in the interview and skipped all the questions with a no. My interview was complete in 15 minutes. I would be rightly rejected but wouldn't have enjoyed working in this ego-centric environment even if selected. Nagarro should train or change the recruitment team to be more compassionate.