Glassdoor Ruse - Anonymous employee Expedia Group Employee Review

2.0
21 Jul 2016
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Flexible working conditions, travel, opportunity to learn from talented colleagues

Cons

Matrix structure means if you have a poor line manager can be restrictive. HR are useless and nobody wants to rock the boat. There is little management training and managers aren't accountable as managers. To become or be promoted into a position managing people there is seemingly no requirement for management skills or experience. If you have a good manager the experience can be different. Big company can mean ridgity. Expedia prides itself on moving fast, but my experience was that a lot of important stuff never got down due to ever growing pipelines and changing priorities There's a lot of work being done by people trying to prove their worth and get noticed rather than what's actually going to drive the business. Data is at the heart of everything, which is a good thing to an extent, so long as the data can be relied on.

Explore other reviews about Expedia Group

5.0
19 May 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Great industry to explore, impressive campus, nice people.

Cons

Old tech stack that requires significant changes

avatar
Expedia Group Response
3w
Thank you for your 5-star review! We're glad that we've made a positive impact on you. We hear you on your feedback about our tech stack and are constantly improving in our offerings. All the best!
2.0
29 Mar 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Constant state of transformation is ripe environment for new hires and functional experts from big name tech companies

Cons

Pre-covid the culture was really special. Collaborative, engaging, people-centric, with a unifying mission to enable travel for the world. Since covid there has been a revolving door of executive leadership, and with each round, they throw out the current strategy to try something "new" without building from the current or past successes. Constant change, but no clear vision or strategy of what they are trying to change to. Lack of strategy and low risk tolerance leads to too many priorities with not enough investment to move the needle in anything. Quarterly layoffs, but executed quietly team by team so as not to make news. No psychological safety. Talent strategy since covid is to hire externally over internal promotions to gain "functional expertise" therefore difficult to grow your career. Siloed divisions not working towards common goal. Lacks operating model maturity needed for a company of this size likely do to revolving door of execs and priorities. A cash cow company with an identity crisis trying to be an AI innovator. Build vs buy mentality slows them down. Too many exec pet projects that aren't vetted with proper business cases.

4
See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All