Great start that fizzled out - Solutions Architect Capgemini Employee Review

3.0
21 Sept 2017
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

1.No Gender Bias, physically challenged bias etc., 2. Good projects in Europe 3. Initial pay package is generally good 4. Sort of a cut above the regular Indian IT services company

Cons

1. Poor work life balance 2. Not employee centric management - not even a bit. One would expect some balance here as Cap has French roots 3. Crazy pre-sales team that makes unrealistic commitments to European clients - you know they are going to hold you to your word/contract literally! 4. mid-senior management not very mature 5. Many project managers have been working for several years in the company and have a turf attitude.

avatar
Capgemini Response
8y
Thank you for your review. We truly appreciate your feedback on our diversity and inclusion focus. You have raised some serious concerns about our operations which we will alert to the right department. We can assure you that our entire management teams are channelizing efforts for better employee experience and satisfaction. We are continuously re-evaluating policies and procedures to ensure that our employees are at the core of everything we do. We hear you on your concerns and will take this feedback into consideration.

Explore other reviews about Capgemini

5.0
5 Jul 2026
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

Company provides training on soft skills and technical skills prior to placing on a project.

Cons

Client contracts can end unexpectedly so you may not get to work on a project long term and change from project to project.

1.0
30 Jun 2026
Anonymous employee
Recommend
CEO approval
Business outlook

Pros

there are no pros for this company

Cons

I was laid off after spending several months on the bench, with "lack of available projects" cited as the reason. However, another consultant in the same role who was also without an active client engagement was retained. As a woman and racial minority, I could not ignore the disparity in how these decisions appeared to be made. Before my termination, I reported being recorded without my consent and raised concerns about conduct that I believed reflected implicit bias. I was referred to as "URM" instead of by my name or role, encouraged toward race based employee resource groups rather than meaningful career opportunities, and repeatedly advocated for fair project placement while on the bench. My employment ended shortly after I raised these concerns. Following my termination, I pursued the matter through the appropriate internal and legal channels. I provided documentation supporting my concerns and gave the company multiple opportunities to investigate and resolve the issues. Rather than meaningfully addressing the evidence or acknowledging the seriousness of the allegations, the company denied wrongdoing, offered what I viewed as a nominal severance, and declined to accept accountability. Employees deserve confidence that concerns about discrimination and retaliation will be investigated objectively and fairly. My experience left me with the opposite impression.

See reviews by: Helpful|Rating|Date|All